Talk:Alison Hughes

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Undue

This is not terrible by any stretch, especially when compared to some of the stuff that gets added to to umpire/referee articles, but the single sentence saying that a player disputed a call she made seems little undue. We have an umpire with over 20 years of top level officiating so to mention a single incident in this career (even briefly) seems to violate WP:BALASP. This also lacks some context and any indication that the incident had any lasting effect on her career. AIRcorn (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the associated 2015 Wimbledon Championships article and could not find a mention of the incident there. This seems like a better place to put this inforamtion as it can be expanded on without as much fear of becoming WP:undue. AIRcorn (talk)

Fine by me if others agree. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Joseph2302 and Aircorn: I have just reviewed that article at DYK. I think that Aircorn make a good point and that the sentence should be removed. – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]