Talk:Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Criticism - "Unbalanced" tag

This section makes the whole page feel biased against the ACMD. Was the Commons committee report really completely negative about the ACMD as the selection of quotes suggests? And even if so, this section really must be balanced with some other views. I'll look into this myself when I have the time, but in the meantime I've applied an "Unbalanced" tag. Martpol (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems reasonably balanced to me. The tag is too broad brush and so I have removed it. Please tag sections if they seem to need attention as this will be clearer. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Martpol. The Criticism section concentrates on a Commons Committee report now four years old, but I had to re-read the article to understand that this was a long time ago, before Nutt became chairman. This section should become an "earlier criticism" section and "recent criticism" - relevant to the Nutt controversy - should be shown separately. This needs to balance criticism from government with criticism of the government's handling of the committee and its chairman. I would write this if I was qualified to do so but it needs someone who knows the ACMD and the issues better than me.Gordoncph (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Value for money?

This "if it still represented value for money for the public" was just inserted but I heard David Nutt on TV the other day saying that the members aren't paid anything to be on the committee! Should this be changed/removed? Smartse (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC) (signed late)[reply]

It comes from this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/02/drugspolicy-drugs Pfistermeister (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]