This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
If there's 'considerable uncertainty' about her, and we don't even know her last name, where she's from or anything about her, maybe this should not be a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkcas (talk • contribs) 20:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
She passes WP:N, by virtue of her listing in the Dictionary of National Biography and the subsequent ODNB. Notability is not the same as uncertainty, and contra-wise. And any number of royal folk are known by a single name. Prod removed. --Tagishsimon(talk)00:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it just me that finds the sentance - "William of Malmesbury mentions that one of William's daughters was betrothed to Harold, but makes him speak of her to William as dead in 1066." a bit confusing? I had to read it several times. Does it mean that William of Malmesbury records Harold as speaking to William of Normandy as though Adeliza is dead? Could it be better worded? AndrewJFulker (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]