Talk:Acrocomia aculeata

"Sole species?"

According to the Kew checklist, A. media is considered a valid species by Acevedo-Rodríguez & Strong, although not by Govaerts. It's inconsistent with NPOV to ignore Acevedo and Strong (especially when Govaerts appears to be the one who compiled the Kew list and acknowledged the fact that Acevedo & Strong disagree with him. Guettarda 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

"A case for three species"

Henderson, et al 1997 - Field Guide to the Palms of Americas - lists two species of Acrocomium: A. aculeata and A. hassleri. A. hassleri occurs in Brazil. A. media occurs in Puerto rico and the Virgin Islands, where it is native. I think there is justification to write in three species vs. one. They each have distinctive characteristics. User:Liberi88 9 Jan 2009 Liberia88 (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Move

I moved the page, since it is clearly not monotypic. However, I'm not sure what to do with the following: |fossil_range = {{fossil range|70}}[[Late Cretaceous]] - Recent I'm not sure if this applies to the species or the genus. I have asked the editor who added the line for details, including a ref. Guettarda (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acrocomia aculeata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714194023/http://www.ciat.cgiar.org:80/ipgri/fruits_from_americas/frutales/Ficha%20Acrocomia%20aculeata.htm to http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/ipgri/fruits_from_americas/frutales/Ficha%20Acrocomia%20aculeata.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)