Talk:Aang

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleAang was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
February 11, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
November 14, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
December 8, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
January 18, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 7, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 13, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 24, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 17, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 20, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 11, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2021Good article reassessmentKept
July 5, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of February 19, 2008.
Current status: Delisted good article

GAR

This article needs to have a GAR done again to revamp it, although one was published in 2021, it was not very exhaustive and they did not say what the problems were, and that time it maintained its status, but now it is much worse since there are many sections without references, The criticism section is very short and even more so if we talk about a renowned series such as Avatar: The Last Airbender. In conclusion, an article that has not aged well. 2801:1CA:E:1411:38A7:3642:A543:30DA (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional character, does not need sources in some stuff. xq 11:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of spam opening GAR requests, it would be better if you fixed them yourself. But yes a section is pretty short so xq 11:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Aang

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in bad shape. It is not updated yet; there are a lot of unsourced statements, the "bending the elements" section is written like lists instead of prose and the reception section is too flimsy. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.