Talk:A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I'm not a poetry expert, but I do enjoy Donne, and I enjoyed this article. Curly Turkey (gobble) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Nicely-written, easy-to-follow prose (I made a few minor edits) Curly Turkey (gobble) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    At least it seems to me to be "broad in its coverage" (not an expert). Curly Turkey (gobble) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Criticism covers both strengths and weaknesses. Curly Turkey (gobble) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    I filled out the PD-art tag's missing parameters. Curly Turkey (gobble) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Only one image, a portrait of Donne. More would be nice, but it's a short article. Any images of, say, a 17th-century compass? (This won't affect whether or not this article passes) Curly Turkey (gobble) 08:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: