Talk:A Comparison of the Conception of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Apparently neither taught to King nor demanded of his acedemic work
All I see is character assassination based on claimed inadequate referencing by a student according to standards apparently neither taught to King nor demanded of his acedemic work. King wanted a doctorate. The proffessors wanted a paying student. Neither were trying to turn King into some kind of expert in documentation creation. They helped educate a man who has had a positive influence on America greater than all the nobodies critisizing his referencing style all put together. 4.250.138.208 07:50, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Is King's dissertation notable enough to receive its own article? What is notable about it except the fact that it was about 33% plagiarized? Do other people with PhD's get articles on their dissertations? Gdwq 22:46, 10 July 2005 (UTC)