Talk:ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
	This redirect is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

New Page: Proficiency

How do you feel about creating a new page "Proficiency"? I would like to be able to compare different ideas of language proficience, as they vary between European, US, and other standards, and do not feel that either the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages or the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines pages would be sufficient. (Note: I am cross-posting this to several discussion pages, but would like responses on the ACTFL Proficienca Guidelines page) samwaltz 00:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

subdivisions

Sub-subdividisions are also made within one level, I believe.Kdammers (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines

New Page: Proficiency

subdivisions

Navigation menu

Search