Talk:2010 Football League One play-off final

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good article2010 Football League One play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2021Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 10, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Millwall finally gained promotion through the play-offs on the sixth attempt after winning the 2010 Football League One play-off Final?
Current status: Good article

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Valereee (talk19:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 20:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: A exceptionally well referenced and written article. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Football League One play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 07:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Lead


Route to the final

Background

Summary

Post-match

References

  • #15, 16 — Retrieval dates not needed for printed matter.
Usernameunique hey! Thanks so much for taking up the review. I've addressed and/or responded to all your comments above. Let me know if there's anything more I can do. I think you might have not placed the nomination onhold or I might be pre-empting you doing that. Either way, if there's anything else, just shout. Cheers again. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey The Rambling Man, my pleasure! I added a couple comments above (plus a one-comment review of the references), but nothing to get in the way of a pass for this fine article. (Well, per your comment on the 2006 article review, I guess I'll put it on hold for 20 minutes first, let the bot go through, and then pass it.) --Usernameunique (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Usernameunique cheers, as before I think the detail is enough and links to articles which describe in more detail what the structure was. Thanks again for the reviews. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]