Talk:1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing 1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane using a top-to-bottom format that hints at all issues within the article. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review Bot Checks
  • Dablinks – No disambiguations
  • Checklinks – No dead or questionable links
  • Automatic peer reviewer – No errors. Good work!
Lead
  • You ought to try a more interesting opening sentence. The current one is a boring boilerplate, and should, again, be changed to something more interesting. This was a high impacting tropical cyclone that struck the East Coast of the United States, after all.
  • "Advanced warning allowed hundreds of people to evacuate ahead of the hurricane making landfall in northeastern North Carolina on August 23 with winds of about 90 mph (150 km/h)." – Try splitting this sentence up. You introduce a tidbit about the scale of hurricane evacuation and then plop in information about landfall location and intensity.
  • "Similarly heavy damage occurred in Maryland, mostly from crop damage." – 'Heavy damage', mostly from 'crop damage'. A bit redundant, since damage is, well, damage. It would've worked if you had a damage totaled followed by 'mostly from crop damage' but in this case you don't. Try mixing it up so you don't have to indicate that crop damage accounted for a lot of damage, which sounds strange.
  • "In Canada, heavy rainfall assisted firefighters,..." – Clarify. I know it sounds almost like common sense, but how did the rains help the firefighters? Were they suddenly thirsty, so the rains helped satisfy their thirst? Certainly not, but, alas, please clarify. It would be helpful if you included where in particular as well. Canada is pretty big. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Meteorological history
Preparations and impact
Other sections