Talk:1915 Galveston hurricane

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good article1915 Galveston hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 20, 2019Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 17, 2023.

Untitled

This is the talk-page for article: 1915 Galveston Hurricane.

Topics from 2006

Created

The article "1915 Galveston Hurricane" was created in April 2006 by long-term, periodic user Storm05, as a full-length draft (with infobox), but with many spelling/grammar or accuracy issues and unclosed ref-tag footnote issues. Those issues persisted for over 2 years. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

If you're going to make an article in the future, make something useful, like an article on Hurricane Craze's LNSB list ;) Just kidding, but good start on the storm. Yes, you got a B class storm on the first try. The content is there, but some general todo is fixing some grammatical and spelling errors. Wording isn't the best in places, but overall, good job. I just can't believe the storm didn't have an article already. There's still plenty of room for an improvement. Hurricanehink 19:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Topics from 2008

Second in the early 20th century? No.

According to 20th century, the century began on Jan 1, 1901. Thus, the 1900 hurricane was in the last year of the *19th* century. 86.136.250.154 (talk) 00:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrofit topic year headers

21-Sep-2008: I have added subheaders above as "Topics from 2006" (etc.) to emphasize the dates of topics in the talk-page. Older topics might still apply, but using the year headers helps to focus on more current issues as well. Also, I put a topic for "Created" at the top to explain the article background. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality cleanup from April 2006

21-Sep-2008: This week, I have completed most copy-edit updates to handle spelling/grammar, accuracy, run-on sentences, and unclosed ref-tag issues originating in the April-2006 draft revision. There had been over 50 quality problems, and some of them had persisted for over 2 years. See details at "/Comments". -Wikid77 (talk) 09:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

  • http://www.stp.uh.edu/vol65/138/news/news4.html
    • In 1915 Galveston hurricane on 2011-05-25 02:44:15, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
    • In 1915 Galveston hurricane on 2011-06-02 02:44:24, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1915 Galveston hurricane/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
This is the quality-comments page for article: 1915 Galveston Hurricane.

Cleanup from April 2006

21-Sep-2008: This week, I have completed most copy-edit updates to handle spelling/grammar, accuracy, and unclosed ref-tag issues originating in the April-2006 draft. There had been over 50 problems, and some of them had persisted for over 2 years:

  • the beach erosion was noted as "300 inch" but actually "300 ft";
  • spellings for "still" were "sill" (and "fatalities" were "fatalites") etc.;
  • several run-on sentences were split with semicolons or commas;
  • unclosed ref-tag footnotes hid unseen sections of text, with bogus tags (such as "</ef>"); and
  • the ref-tag named "mwr" had 2 conflicting definitions/URLs.
When first written, the article had been noted as a draft version, but was never fully checked for accuracy, spelling/grammar, and ref-tag structures. However, the problems were massive: perhaps over 50 misspelled words, verb problems, and run-on sentences, plus errors in unclosed ref-tag pairing. I think the draft preceded the quality/level check-list seen in recent talk-pages, so I think the check-list has been a great improvement to Wikipedia practices, but only if articles are not passed too quickly. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 05:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1915 Galveston hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricane Noah (talk · contribs) 02:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Review

Should be it. Great article. NoahTalk 15:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]