Slave pass

Slave pass written by Sarah H. Savage, dated September 19, 1843, giving permission for an enslaved person named Mack to stay on Bedon's Alley for two months (College of Charleston Libraries)

James Thomson placed a runaway slave ad in the newspaper on Christmas Day 1818 informing his fellow Charlestonians that he would pay $10 for the return of "Sandy...an African by birth...having 3 black streaks on his forehead, being the marks of his country...He writes, and may attempt to forge a pass." (Charleston Daily Courier, December 31, 1818)

Slave pass for Benjamin McDaniel in Shenandoah County, Virginia, 1843 (Schomburg Collection, NYPL)

Preprinted blank slave-pass forms from the Lemuel Grant papers at the Atlanta History Center, probably for enslaved people hired to work for the Atlanta and West Point Rail Road

In the history of slavery in the United States, a slave pass was a written document granting permission for an enslaved person to move around without escort by an enslaver. A typical slave pass was a handwritten document that listed the names of enslaved and enslaver, the destination of the slave, and the duration of time for which they had been released. A slave who had been granted a slave pass had to have it on hand "at all times" and show it, on demand, to any white who asked to see it. One of the rationales for anti-literacy laws outlawing education of slaves was to prevent the enslaved from forging slave passes. According to historian Ryan Quintana, slave passes were a tool of social control: "...passes importantly extended planter authority and claims of ownership over mobile enslaved bodies, and provided an important differentiation between slaves who had run away from plantations and those simply, and obligingly, beyond the plantation's walls. Slave passes were, in effect, written extensions of planter power. They acknowledged a planter's liability for an enslaved person's actions while outside of the plantation boundaries, and simultaneously maintained the planter's abstract claims of property ownership over enslaved persons' bodies. Tickets, then, transformed slaves into abstracted, embodied extensions of their owners' desires granting them the legal rights to move to and fro and into places that might otherwise have been deemed dangerous. With a ticket, a slave could travel up and down South Carolina's numerous waterways, visit neighboring plantations, and even enter stores and markets to conduct trades for their owners and, some feared, for themselves...given the variety of slaves' activities, both on and off the plantation, passes were necessarily and intentionally vague." This vagueness often annoyed slave patrollers, who would have to cede to the limits of the slave pass in order to avoid violating the property rights of slave owners.

In 1857, De Bow's Review published a copy of the rules that guided the management of a rice plantation in South Carolina; the document called slave passes tickets, and stated, "No one is to be absent from the place without a ticket, which is always to be given to such as ask it, and have behaved well. All persons coming from the Proprietor's other places should show their tickets; to the Overseer, who should sign his name on the back; those going off the plantation should bring back their tickets; signed". In Alabama the penalties for forging a slave pass were 39 lashes with a whip if the culprit was a free person, and 50 or 100 lashes for an enslaved person, depending if it was a first or second offense. In 1853 the Montgomery and West Point Railroad wanted "negroes traveling alone" to carry two passes, "showing permission of their owners to pass over the road, one of which passes will be retained by the conductor."

Granting slave passes could be financially remunerative for enslaver, who could collect unearned income by hiring out their chattel slaves to other employers. As Moses Grandy explained in his 1844 slave narrative, "He gave me a pass to work for myself; so I obtained work by the piece where I could, and paid him out of my earnings what we had agreed on; I maintained myself on the rest, and saved what I could. In this way I was not liable to be flogged and ill used. He paid seventy, eighty, or ninety dollars a year for me, and I paid him twenty or thirty dollars a year more than that."

See also

• Freedom of movement under United States law

References

Sources

• Hadden, Sally E. (2001). "Chapter 4. In Times of Tranquility: Everyday Slave Patrols". Slave Patrols: Law and Violence in Virginia and the Carolinas. Harvard Historical Studies No. 138. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 105–136. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1g809mv. ISBN 9780674258013. JSTOR j.ctv1g809mv. OCLC 603622768.
• Quintana, Ryan A. (2018). Making a slave state: political development in early South Carolina. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-4696-4106-5.

Further reading

• Browne, Simone (2015). Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-7530-2. LCCN 2015012563. OCLC 895338023.
• Müller, Viola Franziska (2022). Escape to the city: fugitive slaves in the antebellum urban South. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-4696-7107-9.
• Parenti, Christian (2003). The soft cage: surveillance in America, from slavery to the war on terror. New York, NY: BasicBooks. ISBN 978-0-465-05484-8. LCCN 2003013330. OCLC 52429761.