Shattock v Devlin
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Shattock v Devlin | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | High Court of New Zealand |
Full case name | W R Shattock (senior) First Plaintiff, B A Clements Second Plaintiff, W R Shattock (junior) Third Plaintiff v E J Devlin First Defendant, J P McDonnell Second Defendant, The Attorney-General sued in respect of the New Zealand Police Third Defendant |
Decided | 8 January 1990 |
Citation | [1990] 2 NZLR 88 |
Court membership | |
Judge sitting | Wylie J |
Keywords | |
negligence |
Shattock v Devlin [1990] 2 NZLR 88 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the defence of Implied license to enter a property to a trespass claim.[1]
References
- ^ McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.
Categories:
- Orphaned articles from September 2023
- All orphaned articles
- Articles needing additional references from August 2019
- All articles needing additional references
- Articles with multiple maintenance issues
- Use dmy dates from July 2019
- Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases
- New Zealand tort case law
- 1990 in New Zealand law
- 1990 in case law
- All stub articles
- New Zealand case law stubs