Protein efficiency ratio

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Eggs have the best protein quality with a corrected PER of 3.24[1]

Protein efficiency ratio (PER) is based on the weight gain of a test subject divided by its intake of a particular food protein during the test period.

From 1919 until very recently, the PER had been a widely used method for evaluating the quality of protein in food.

The food industry in Canada currently uses the PER as the standard for evaluating the protein quality of foods.[2]

The official method for determining the protein efficiency ratio is from Health Canada's Health Protection Branch Method FO-1, October 15, 1981.[3]

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration now uses the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) as the basis for the percent of the U.S. recommended daily allowance (USRDA) for protein shown on food labels. However, the PER is still used in certain FDA regulations. The US FDA official methods to calculate the PER are as stated in the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed. (1995) Section 45.3.05, AOAC Official Method 982.30 Protein Efficiency Ratio Calculation Method; and Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. (2005).[4]

See also

References

  1. Hernández, M.; Montalvo, I.; Sousa, V.; Sotelo, A. (February 1996). "The protein efficiency ratios of 30:70 mixtures of animal:vegetable protein are similar or higher than those of the animal foods alone". The Journal of Nutrition. 126 (2): 574–581. doi:10.1093/jn/126.2.574. ISSN 0022-3166. Archived from the original on 2024-08-18. Retrieved 2024-08-16. Archived 2024-08-18 at the Wayback Machine
  2. "Protein - Elements within the Nutrition Facts Table - Food - Canadian Food Inspection Agency". inspection.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2014-03-23. Archived 2015-07-11 at the Wayback Machine
  3. "Protein - Elements within the Nutrition Facts Table - Food - Canadian Food Inspection Agency". www.inspection.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2014-03-23. Archived 2015-07-11 at the Wayback Machine
  4. 21 C.F.R. §106.160