Sample contribution assessment Athenian inscription, part of a tribute list of cash-paying members of the Delian League.
This is a list of known military alliances of ancient Greek poleis. They comprise the terms symmachia and koinon, both of which meant a league for the mutually supportive conduct of war, both offensive and defensive. The terms might be used with the same referents in the same source or be used mutually exclusively in the sources. Both words had other meanings, which are not covered here.
In theory at the time the poleis were meant to be autonomous. In fact the autonomy varied a great deal, which everyone of the times knew. Complaints and revolts were common. Apart from the domination of large states, such as Athens and Sparta, the leagues were named after the ethnic regions they were intended to defend. They were an intermediate step between the independent poleis and the Macedonian, Roman, or Persian provincial administrations that brought the poleis to an end and replaced the politeia with a local government subordinate to a province. "Federation," "confederacy", and a third term, sympoliteia only describe the degree of independence, or lack of it. Different scholars respect a wide degree of latitude.
Tabular list
English names
Greek names
Members
Dates
Map or picture
League of Athena Ilias, League of the cities, League of Ilion, Aeolian League, Confederacy of Athena Ilias
In 306 BC Antigonus I granted to Ilion an alliance in the Troad for support of the yearly Panathenaia festival for Athena Ilias. Renewed in 77 BC by the Roman quaestor. Coins minted until the late 1st century. The league is known entirely from inscriptions.[1]
Defined in Herodotus 149 as a dodecapolis. The many references to "the Aeolians" and "Aeolis" imply a koinon, as do joint operations by name with Ionia. Earliest use of name is Hittite Ayawalas, 14th cent. BC.[2]
Latest certain evidence of earliest presence is 650 BC. The League survived into Hellenistic times, until it was disbanded upon its annexation by the Roman Republic in 133 BC
First parliamentary act given at Labraunda in 267 BC under Ptolemid rule. Other cities were under Macedonian rule at different times. Ceased to exist under Roman rule.
Λυκίων τὸ κοινόν, κοινὸν τῶν Λυκίων, koinon ton Lykion
About 28 poleis representing all of Lycia, judging by their individual minting of coins. These are listed in the article.
A voluntary pro-Roman alliance offered to the Roman Republic as an alternative to annexation by Rhodes. The Romans took it, treating Lycia as a free protectorate, 168 BC until 43 AD.
Four merides[c] of poleis.[d] Format: meris number, coin name,[e] literary name, capital city. I, protes, none, Amphipolis; II, deuteras, Amphaxitis, Thessalonika; III, none, Bottia, Pella; IV, tetartis, Upper (ano) Makedonia, Heraclea Lynci
Founded in 432 BC by Olynthus, Pydna (After 377 BC), Torone, Potidaea and a number of smaller cities, disbanded in 379 BC, but reestablished in 377 BC, and finally annexed in 348 BC by Philip II of Macedon
The Phocian koinon enabled Phocis to act as one nation, which the sources called a chora ("country") and a patris ("fatherland"). Temples date to 7th century BC. 20-22 poleis were dioecised in 346 BC with the alliance at the end of the Third Sacred War. Some few made sympoliteiai subsequently.[5]
Earliest certain date is 455 BC in response to an attack by the Messenians. Partitioned by Epirus and the Aetolian League in 230 BC, and dissolved after the battle of Actium in 30 BC. Attested in both literature and inscriptions. The specific impulse in 455 was defense, followed by nationalistic and economic measures.
^Formerly each of these three tribal capitals sent a tetrad (four delegates) to a governing civil council. Now, a koinon was formed of the three poleis, and was placed in the care of another, religious council. The religion was the worship of deified Augustus
^The Macedonian koinon was perhaps the least like an alliance and most like a unified state (a chora called Μακεδονία) ruled by an autocrat. According to recent studies it was created piecemeal by Philip II, appearing in the 5th century BC under the ethnic Macedonians in an inscription. The four-part structure was the result of successive annexations: an original lowland Old Kingdom (Meris III), to which the mountainous Upper Macedonia (Meris IV) was added on the west side of the Axios River. Subsequently Merides II and I in that order were added on the east of the Axios. Philip called these divisions ethna as they were considered different peoples. The name Merides appears in the coins later, when they were integrated into the new whole. Obviously the numbering was assigned after the whole had developed, as it runs counter to the annexation. Philip's capital Pella, the original Macedonia, was thus in III.[3]
^Moderns present two theories: 1) The merides are Macedonian in origin 2) the merides are Roman. Exponents of 1) cite the koinon coins appearing under Philip V. Also, Meris is related to meros, "part", but the Romans would have created them as independent republics to begin with.
^There were many more settlements in Macedonia, but only poleis could belong to a koinon or participate in a sympoliteia. Macedonian poleis were created from settlements by Philip II, Alexander's father, during his initial modernization of the then backward kingdom of Macedonia.
^More recent studies indicate the four districts were created by Philip II, r. 359-336 BC, under the designation of ethne. Although he granted many of their cities the status of poleis, thus serving as their founder, it is questionable whether Philip joined them into a koinon at this time. He called his arrangement Greater Macedonia. The coinage of the koinon waits for Philip V, who is clearly less powerful and less of an autocrat.
^"330". Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum. attalus.org. Retrieved 2 July 2023. Inscriptions from different sources are linked to the Attalus entry.
^Rubinstein, Lene (2004). "Aeolis and South-western Mysia". An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford: Oxford U. Press. p. 1035. The existence of particular common political institutions on an inter-polis level is not directly attested in our sources, but it is highly likely that there was some kind of Aiolian parallel to the joint political and religious institutions of the Ionian dodekapolis that were centred on the Panionion.
^Decourt, Jean-Claude; et al. (2004). "Thessalia and Adjacent Regions". An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford: Oxford U. Press. pp. 676–731.
^Oulhen, Jacquew (2004). "Phocis". An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford: Oxford U. Press. pp. 399–430.
.svg)
