Help talk:IPA/Sardinian

links & references to this page

i'm quite a newbie and unexperienced editor, so i'd like to ask some help here. i decided to create this page because when trying to add the ipa transcription in sardinian at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvatore_Sirigu i noticed some issues i noted down in the talk there, namely:

• the iso 639-1 lang tag "sc" points to serbocroatian; i'm totally in favour of keeping serbocroatian as macrolanguage, but the lang tag "sc" according to iso 639-1 corresponds to sard. after noticing that i tried with the 3-letter tag and...
• the iso 639-2 "srd" is not recognised as for sard yet, but still as a future ipa template.

so the IPA-srd was still a template (Template:IPA-srd) within the category future ipa templates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Future_IPA_templates). once i've created this page, could anyone tell me how to delete the Template:IPA-srd and establish the IPA-srd as linking to this article?

a couple of examples of pages where i tried to introduce the IPA-srd link to phonetic transcriptions:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvatore_Sirigu
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandro_Sirigu

thanks in advance Sacdegemecs (talk) 11:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Help talk:IPA which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

changes by User:IvanScrooge98

User:IvanScrooge98 removed all my contextual notes regarding the phonotactics that condition the pronunciation of sardinian sounds. besides being a hard work now deleted without any explanation/reason (such a big deletion with not even bother to add a comment), it clearly impoverishes the article. can any neutral user take a look at it? Sacdegemecs (talk) 00:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@Sacdegemecs: I simply cleaned it up in accordance to how other IPA help pages are. That was not the place where to put all of that stuff. Please consider improving the phonology section at Sardinian language instead, where the help links and where readers should find a more detailed explanation of phonotactics. Sorry for omitting a comment. イヴァンスクルージ九十八_（会話） 08:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98: and your contribution with respect to that relevant information is just delete it without even bother to commenting about it or move it yourself to footnotes? such a great contribution, congratulations. anyone who used hours to study and document useful contents for articles in wikipedia, as i did with the phonotactics contexts in manuals of sardinian, would be grateful towards your rich editions. have you ever (really) contributed to another IPA help page? please, any neutral editor can comment here?Sacdegemecs (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@Sacdegemecs: errr... excuse me? According to your contributions, you are the one who never contributed to an IPA help page besides this one. I kindly invite you to explore the various pages, and you will notice that what you added here is superfluous. Also, you merely described the possible positions of sounds, which are already provided with an example each. Nothing more to say. イヴァンスクルージ九十八_（会話） 17:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98: ok, great, deleting 3332 bytes with no comment/justification until i asked you about it must be a better contribution to the ipa help pages than mine and a best practice according to your standards. thanks for letting me know. next time i think about spending some days researching, writing and actually contributing (not just deleting without comments), i will remember there are users like you around. that way i will not waste my time. are you also surveying the wikipedia in sardinian or there i might be able to contribute in a safer way? are you a blocked user there as in the wiktionary (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:IvanScrooge98) for your rich contributions? could that description of your behaviour there ("unacceptable conduct: Disruptive editing in languages they don't speak; warned and blocked before for the same reason.") applicable here? i'm still waiting for the opinion of a neutral editor. Sacdegemecs (talk) 01:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)