Gallardo v. Marstiller
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gallardo v. Marstiller | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued January 10, 2022 Decided June 6, 2022 | |
Full case name | Gianinna Gallardo, an Incapacitated Person, By and Through Her Parents and Co-Guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo v. Simone Marstiller, In Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration |
Docket no. | 20-1263 |
Citations | 596 U.S. ___ (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer |
Laws applied | |
Medicaid Act |
Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case that held the Medicaid Act permits a state to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care. The case was brought by the parents of Gianinna Gallardo, who was in a persistent vegetative state.[1]
References
- ^ "Gallardo v. Marstiller". Oyez.
External links
- Text of Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
Categories:
- Use mdy dates from May 2022
- Articles with short description
- Short description matches Wikidata
- All stub articles
- United States Supreme Court stubs
- 2022 in United States case law
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
- United States statutory interpretation case law