Davis v. United States (2011)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. (November 2022) |
Davis v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued March 21, 2011 Decided June 16, 2011 | |
Full case name | Willie Gene Davis v. United States |
Docket no. | 09-11328 |
Citations | 564 U.S. 229 (more) 131 S. Ct. 2419; 180 L. Ed. 2d 285 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | United States v. Davis, No. 2:07-cr-0248-WKW, 2008 WL 1927377 (M.D. Ala. 2008) (denying motion to suppress), aff'd, 598 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2010), cert. granted, 131 S. Ct. 502 (2010). |
Holding | |
| |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Alito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Kagan |
Concurrence | Sotomayor |
Dissent | Breyer, joined by Ginsburg |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule".[1] This simply means that if law enforcement officers conduct a search in a reasonable manner with respect to established legal precedent any evidence found may not be excluded from trial based on the exclusionary rule.
See also
References
- ^ Davis v. U.S., 564 US 229 (2011).
External links
- Text of Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Categories:
- Use mdy dates from September 2023
- Wikipedia articles needing rewrite from November 2022
- All articles needing rewrite
- Articles with short description
- Short description matches Wikidata
- 2011 in United States case law
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Fourth Amendment case law
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
- All stub articles
- United States Supreme Court stubs