This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Too many Stub Characterisations
Many articles in this category seem to me just sufficient and adequately short for the respective topics. If I want to know more, I can always read or open the Danish article and have it translated. It the respective english (or other foreign language) articles would be longer, it would add more risk of missing new information.
If you look at printed encyclopedias, many articles are even shorter. If is also part of the art of a goog encyclopedia to have short articles that focus on the essentials.
It is also an act of unfriendlyness to downrate many articles to "stubs". Meerwind7 (talk) 10:09, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
