Agrégation d'histoire

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The agrégation externe d'histoire is a French competitive examination for the recruitment of associate professors who teach history or geography at the collège, or lycée level. There is also an agrégation externe de géographie and the agrégation interne d'histoire et géographie. In practice, though not an absolute requirement, it is often used as a selection criterion for teaching history in the CPGE and in higher education.[1]

History

The agrégation d'histoire et de géographie was created in 1831. The division of agrégations between the two disciplines was established under the influence of the geographer Emmanuel de Martonne and with the agreement of the minister, the historian and antiquarian Jérôme Carcopino,[2] in 1941 (decree and order of 28 April) then definitively ratified by the order of 28 September 1943: "an agrégation in history and an agrégation in geography shall be instituted".

Since 2010, it has been necessary to have a master's degree to take this exam, one of the most attractive and selective literary agrégations[3] and remains de facto required to teach history in Classe préparatoire aux grandes écoles or at university.[4]

Structure of the examinations

  • Qualifying examinations (written):
Examination Period Weighting
1. Dissertation on history 7 h 1
2. Dissertation on history 7 h 1
3. Commentary on a historical text 7 h 1
4. Dissertation on geography 7 h 1

Each of the history written tests must deal with a different historical period. These two essays are given in chronological order: if medieval history, for example, is the subject of the first essay, the second essay will automatically deal with the question on modern history or contemporary history (but not ancient history, which may be given as a commentary).

  • Practical and oral exams:
Examination Preparation time Period of exam Weighting
1. General history lecture ("off curriculum") 6 h 1 h

lecture: 0 h 30

interview: 0 h 30

2
2. Commentary on a historical text 6 h 1 h

lecture: 0 h 30

interview: 0 h 30

2
3. Interpretation of a map and/or geographical documents 6 h 1 h

presentation: 0 h 30

interview: 0 h 30

2

Programme questions

In history, two out of four of the questions are renewed each year, with each question remaining on the curriculum for two years. In geography, one question on France is included every year, while the other question changes. Since 2008, the question on France has been topical.

2023 Programme

History questions:

  • Ancient: The Greek world and the East from 404 to 200 BC;
  • Medieval: Cities and state building in North-Western Europe from the 13th to the 15th century (Empire, former Netherlands, France, England);
  • (new question) Modern: Communities and mobilities in the Mediterranean from the end of the 15th century to the mid-18th century;
  • (new question) Contemporary: African societies and the world: a connected history (1900-1980).

Geography questions:

  • Thematic geography: Latin America;
  • (new question) Geography of territories: Populations, settlement and territories in France.

2022 Programme

History questions:

  • (new question) Ancient: The Greek world and the East from 404 to 200 BC;
  • (new question) Medieval: Cities and state building in North-Western Europe from the 13th to the 15th century (Empire, former Netherlands, France, England);
  • Modern: The world of print in Western Europe (ca. 1470 - ca. 1680);
  • Contemporary: Labour in Western Europe from the 1830s to the 1930s. Craft and industrial labour, practices and social issues.

Geography questions:

  • (new question) Thematic geography: Borders;
  • Geography of territories: Populations, settlement and territories in France.

2021 Programme

History questions:

Geography questions:

  •    Geography of territories: Rural areas in France
  •    (new question) Thematic geography: Borders

The subjects for 2021 were: medieval history: 'Stability and precariousness of the written word', contemporary history: 'Being a worker', explanation of texts in modern history: 'Un mémoire sur les continuations de privilèges (vers 1670)' by Antoine Vitré (159?-1674) and geography of territories: 'Paysages et recompositions des espaces ruraux en France'.

The 2021 session was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic due to mandatory distancing and wearing of masks within examination centres by all candidates, during written and oral tests. Oral admission tests were not attended by the public for the 2021 session. 150 candidates were eligible.

2020 Programme

This session was notable for the absence of oral tests due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The written eligibility tests were considered valid as admission tests. They were organised from 22 to 25 June 2020 instead of March.

History questions

  •    (new question) Ancient: Religion and power in the Roman world from 218 BCE to 235 CE;
  •    (new question) medieval: Writing, power and society in the West from the early 12th to the late 14th century (England, France, Italian peninsula, Iberian peninsula);
  •    modern: State, powers and disputes in the French and British monarchies and their American colonies (ca. 1640 - ca. 1780);
  •    contemporary: Culture, media, powers in the United States and Western Europe 1945 - 1991.

Geography questions:

  •    (new question) thematic geography: South-East Asia;
  •    Geography of territories: Rural areas in France

The 2020 topics are: Ancient History composition: "Piety and Impiety in Public Religion".,[5] contemporary history composition: "the 1968s: culture and protest"[6] interpretation of medieval history texts: "The books of a Dominican friar in the 13th century on 17 June 1287"[7] and composition of the geography of territories: "Natural risks and territories in South-East Asia".[8]

Success rates

Statistics for the agrégation d'histoire (2003-2021)[9][10][11]^
Enrolled Not eliminated[12] Admissible[13] Admitted[14]
2023 797[15] 470 
(58.9%)
169 
(36%)
83 
(10.4%)
2022 920 494 
(53.2%)
156 
(31.5%)
74 
(7.4%)
2021 1251 639 
(51.5%)
150 
(23.5%)
73 
(11.4%)
2020 1314 606 (46.12%) None[16] 73 
(12.5%)
2019 1 352 638 (47.2%) 159 (24.9%) 72 (11.28%)
2018 1 467 679 (46%) 152 (22.4%) 72 (10.31%)
2017 1 599 735 (46%) 180 (24.5%) 90 (12.24%)
2016 1 677 817 (49%) 189 (23%) 96 (11.75%)
2015 1 502 714 (47.5%) 185 (26%) 91 (12.7%)
2014 1 569 747 (47%) 164 (22%) 80 (10.7%)
2013 1 937 748 (39%) 198 (26.5%) 100 (12.5%)
2012 1 692 644 (38%) 145 (23%) 70 (10.9%)
2011 1 654 561 (34%) 143 (25%) 71 (12.7%)
2010 2 113 1 051 (50%) 165 (16%) 84 (8%)
2009 2 309 1 234 (53%) 172 (14%) 84 (6.8%)
2008 2 624 1 398 (53%) 193 (14%) 83 (5.9%)
2007 2 721 1 389 (51%) 199 (14%) 92 (6.6%)
2006 2 989 1 575 (53%) 208 (13%) 92 (5.8%)
2005 3 118 1 788 (57%) 254 (14%) 128 (7.2%)
2004 3 049 1 763 (58%) 238 (13.5%) 115 (6.5%)
2003 3 061 1 770 (58%) 269 (15%) 134 (7.6%)

Between 2003 and 2009, the number of successful candidates decreased by 30%, without offsetting the decrease in the number of posts (-37% over the period). From year to year, the competition has become more and more selective: since 2005, the real admission rate has never exceeded 7%, and from 2003 to 2010 (except in 2007), the percentage of admitted candidates compared to those not eliminated was lower than that of the agrégation de philosophie. In 2011, following a sharp drop in the number of candidates not eliminated, the agrégation in history became less selective than that in philosophy.

The success rate varies greatly from one academy to another. It is exceptionally high in the academies of Créteil-Paris-Versailles and Lyon because of the presence of the École Normale Supérieure of rue d'Ulm, Lyon, Cachan (students from the latter benefiting from the preparation offered by rue d'Ulm[17]), the École des Chartes, and renowned faculties such as Paris-I and Paris-IV.[18]

Historians' views on the agrégation d'histoire

Ernest Lavisse
Ernest Lavisse

In 1883, Ernest Lavisse, speaking to Parisian students, said:

"The agrégation will not require of those of you who choose the history of antiquity the slightest notion of epigraphy or archaeology; nor will it require of those who choose the history of the Middle Ages the slightest notion of palaeography or diplomacy or medieval philology [...] and all that you will not be asked for will be indispensable."

In 1888, Ernest Denis, who was to hold the chair of modern history at the Sorbonne, and who was himself an agrégé, said of the agrégation that "there is only one way to improve it, and that is to abolish it!" - what Jacques Le Goff described in 1966 as "words that are, alas, still relevant and likely to remain so". In 1892, it was Ferdinand Lot (who was chartered, not an agrégé and ended his career as a professor of medieval history at the Sorbonne) who judged "that the agrégation is an evil institution which, more than any other, has contributed to our scientific degradation, that it is a gnawing canker which devours the intelligence of teachers and students."

Controversy at the 2011 session

The agrégation d'histoire received unusual amount of attention from the general public in 2011: the text given for the historical commentary test was presented as an authentic medieval text written in the 15th century, when in fact it was a fictionalized reconstruction of Palémon Glorieux, published in 1964.[19] The two historians behind the subject, Catherine Vincent and Denyse Riche, resigned from the jury after their error was revealed by the French media. The Ministry of Education officially took a position by announcing that this error, although not in line with the required scientific rigour, did not lead to the cancellation of the test since the principle of equality between candidates had not been violated.[20]

Famous winners

Famous recipients of the agrégation in history-geography and later in history include:

References

  1. ^ Denis Peiron (2016-03-01). "À quoi sert encore l'agrégation ?". La Croix.
  2. ^ Nicolas Ginsburger (2017). "Historiens et géographes au scalpel de Vichy. Commentaire de « Discussions d'experts sur la licence et l'agrégation de géographie (janvier-février 1943) »". Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines (in French). 31: 141–185.
  3. ^ Colon 2007, p. 10.
  4. ^ Denis Peiron (2016-03-01). "À quoi sert encore l'agrégation ?". La Croix..
  5. ^ Ministère de l'éducation nationale (22 June 2020). "Sujet agrégation histoire dissertation 1 2020" (PDF). devenirenseignant.gouv.fr (in French). Retrieved 26 June 2020.
  6. ^ Ministère de l'éducation nationale (23 June 2020). "Sujet agrégation histoire dissertation 2 2020" (PDF). devenirenseignant.gouv.fr (in French). Retrieved 26 June 2020.
  7. ^ Ministère de l'éducation nationale (24 June 2020). "Sujet agrégation externe explication de textes 2020" (PDF). Devenir Enseignant (in French). Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  8. ^ Ministère de l'éducation nationale (25 June 2020). "Sujet agrégation externe histoire composition de géographie 2020" (PDF). Devenir Enseignant - Devenir enseignant (in French). Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  9. ^ "Les données statistiques des concours - Devenir enseignant". www.devenirenseignant.gouv.fr (in French). Archived from the original on 2022-04-15. Retrieved 2022-03-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  10. ^ "SIAC Concours du 2nd degré : Rapports de jurys - M.J.E.N.R." 2016-03-13. Archived from the original on 2016-03-13. Retrieved 2022-03-26.
  11. ^ "Histoire-géographie". éduscol | Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de la Jeunesse et des Sports - Direction générale de l'enseignement scolaire (in French). Retrieved 2022-03-26.
  12. ^ Candidates who sat the four written tests and passed.
  13. ^ Candidates found to be eligible by the written exam, who then took the oral examination and passed.
  14. ^ Awarded a post (% compared to the number of candidates not eliminated by the written exam).
  15. ^ Due to a change in the CAPES examination, the topics between the two examinations were not linked as it was before : that could explain why a few number of candidates were preparing the agrégation.
  16. ^ Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the oral tests for the 2020 session were cancelled, so the written exams were used to decide admission rather than eligibility.
  17. ^ ":: DEPARTEMENT DE SCIENCES SOCIALES DE L'ENS DE CACHAN ::". archive.wikiwix.com. Retrieved 2022-03-26.
  18. ^ "Concours du second degré – Rapport de jury". archive.wikiwix.com. Secrétariat Général Direction générale des ressources humaines. Retrieved 2022-03-26.
  19. ^ "Le concours d'agrégation d'histoire risque d'être annulé". Le Monde.fr (in French). 24 May 2011. Retrieved 2018-06-06.
  20. ^ "L'agrégation d'histoire se poursuit malgré une bourde". Le Figaro (in French). 2011-05-24. Retrieved 2018-06-06.


Bibliography

  • André Chervel (1993). Histoire de l'agrégation. Paris: Kimé. p. 289.
  • Colon, David (2007). Passer l'agrégation d'histoire. Paris: Sciences po. ISBN 9782724610420.
  • Jean-François Condette (2015). "Le recrutement et la formation initiale des enseignants d'histoire-géographie en France au Template:XXe siècle. Jalons pour une histoire". Mélanges de l'École française de Rome. 127 (2): 219-238.
  • Loukia Efthymiou (2003). "Le genre des concours". Clio. 18: 91-112.
  • Nicolas Ginsburger, "Historians and Geographers in the Vichy Scalpel". Commentary on "Discussions d'experts sur la licence et l'agrégation de géographie (January–February 1943)", Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines, autumn 2017, n°31, p. 141-185.
  • Yves Verneuil (2005). Les Agrégés. Paris: Belin. p. 367.

External links

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Agrégation_d%27histoire"