Template talk:Infobox chemical analysis

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject iconInfoboxes
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconChemistry Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

An infobox for chemical analysis techniques

Inspired by Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Instruments/Templates/Infobox instrument; Template is a modified version of Template:Infobox camera.

A list of articles that would get this infobox: Analytical_chemistry#Specific_Technologies_and_Instrumentation.

Comments and suggestions appreciated, thanks. --Kkmurray 18:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link to proposed infobox: Infobox chemical analysis --Kkmurray 02:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Example of infobox

Infobox for the page High performance liquid chromatography

Extended content
High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Photograph of an HPLC system
Acronym HPLC
Classification Separation process
Analytes organic molecules
biomolecules
ions
polymers
Manufacturers Agilent Technologies
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Eksigent Technologies
Hitachi
PerkinElmer, Inc.
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments
Thermo Electron Corporation
Varian, Inc.
Waters Corporation
Other Techniques
Related Chromatography
Aqueous Normal Phase Chromatography
Ion exchange chromatography
Size exclusion chromatography
Micellar liquid chromatography
Hyphenated Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Comments

Looks good. I'm a little concerned about the manufacturers section being a problem with companies trying to be included.--Nick Y. 18:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a question of whether the utility outweighs the spam-magnet aspect. I haven't really found the section very useful and there is a chronic problem with external link spam in the instrumentation pages (even more in biomedical instruments), so it wouldn't be much of a loss and it would take away the linkspam opportunity. --Kkmurray 20:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sync with sandbox

{{editprotected}} Please sync with the new sandbox, which splits the documentation to a separate doc page and tidies the code up a bit to match the style which has prevailed since this template was last modified (in early 2008). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]