User talk:MusikAnimal/responseHelper.js

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Update UAA responses

@MusikAnimal: Could you add a template that I recently added in the WP:UAA section? What I added. Thanks, Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: Thanks, we definitely needed this. Are we sure the bots will recognize it? Pinging maintainers JamesR and Darkwind MusikAnimal talk 16:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh man, I really felt pressured that you won't like it since you are one of the best-known administrators, atleast from my POV (:P). Also, didn't notify the editors of it so it probably won't. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I forgot to mention this but I hoped that there would be a way to make it possible for editors to sort of clerk UAA and AIV without making others think they are administrators and not being bureaucratic. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Any contributions to scripts/gadgets etc are welcomed! :) Not sure about the clerking, that's something you'll need to bring up at WT:UAA or another appropriate venue. I know at AIV non-admin declines aren't usually well-received. In general reports are processed quickly so it's not much of an issue MusikAnimal talk 17:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: It is impossible for me to add the template to the script since it contains your personal settings (?). Dat GuyTalkContribs 06:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but you don't need to edit the script directly to contribute. You can make suggestions or paste code on the talk page, just like you are now! ;) MusikAnimal talk 07:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add ANI, AN and AE

@MusikAnimal: Thanks very much for this script - it's highly useful. Is there any way you could add ANI, AN, and AE to it, as well? I don't want to make a fool of myself by trying Thanks, GABgab 21:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralizationsAreBad: Thanks! I don't think ANI, AN and AE have templated responses, right? If you just want a link, add this code to the bottom of Special:MyPage/common.js:
mw.util.addPortletLink("p-navigation", "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ANI", "WP:ANI");
...and so forth for other venues. I'm not sure if I want to add these to the core script because not everyone works there, and responseHelper doesn't offer any functionality when editing those pages. Hope this helps MusikAnimal talk 21:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add {{RFPP|co}} to RfPP responses

@MusikAnimal: {{RFPP|co}} was added here for use when protecting will lead to collateral damage. As a side note, is there any particular reason PERM and RFPP require you to be editing a section? Bit of a first world problem, but occasionally when I check it out there's a backlog and I must copy the correct template code. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy First off, a belated congrats on your adminship! I was upset when I saw I missed the opportunity to cast my support !vote, but you didn't need it anyway :)
I've added the "co" option with Special:Diff/1115769302. Sorry it took a while to get back to this, and thanks for the ping so that I could keep the notification active to remind me to revisit it!
I guess there's not a good reason that PERM pages require to edit a section. RFPP I imagine you'll get some edit conflicts time to time. At any rate, it's possible to make them work for both sections and the entire page, but it's a bit of work that I'm afraid I don't have time for right now. Note also the behaviour is different; for an entire page (like AIV), you need to have the cursor in the right place. For sections, it puts the content at the bottom.
Taking this a step further, I have long thought about making this work with DiscussionTool's reply feature. I was digging through their code the other day and it looks like this could be possible. At the next Hackathon I might devote to working on that, and then you don't ever need to hit [edit] at all. For now I'm going to keep your ping notification active, as a reminder ;)
Thanks for letting me know about the new RFPP option. Kind regards and hope you're enjoying adminship, MusikAnimal talk 03:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make p-navigation portlet links optional?

Hey @MusikAnimal. Any interest in changing if (!mw.config.get('wgEditMessage')) { to something like if (!mw.config.get('wgEditMessage') && window.responseHelperLeftMenuLinks !== false) {? That way the user could set window.responseHelperLeftMenuLinks = false; to not display the left menu links. If not no worries. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Novem Linguae  Done with Special:Diff/1163581043 and documented. I want with window.responseHelperNavLinks as theoretically this script could (with modifications) be used on RTL wikis in which case "LeftMenu" would be misleading. And heck, Vector-2022 and such is constantly changing things so it may not stay on the left even for LTR languages :)
Thanks for the fine suggestion, MusikAnimal talk 16:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect indentation

Hi MusikAnimal. The RFP replies for rollback, confirmed, and page mover are double indented (::). Could these be changed to single indents (:) so they're consistent with the other pages? Thanks, Anarchyte (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Anarchyte  Done I believe at some point the submission template at PERM had the request body indented but that has since changed, hence why the replies were double-indented. Thanks for pointing out that things have changed (I agree consistency is key).
Also WP:RFP = Request for Page Protection! Confusingly though Special:PrefixIndex/WP:RFP/ all points to WP:PERM pages. This is why I always use PERM and not RFP. I proposed changing the target at RFP ~8 years ago but the discussion didn't gain much traction. Maybe a proper RfD is in order. MusikAnimal talk 15:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]