Template talk:World Series Year

Baseball Template‑class

	Baseball portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This template was considered for deletion on 21 October 2011. The result of the discussion was "snowball keep".

TfD request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add {{Tfd|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} to the template page. I have nominated the template for deletion here. Powers ^T 21:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Added {{Tfd|{{subst:PAGENAME}}|type=inline}} instead, since this seems to be an inline template. Anomie ⚔ 23:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

How about some noinclude tags so the TfD doesn't mess up highly visable pages. CTJF83 00:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Seriously messing up the look of countless articles during their highest viewership of the year. -- preschooler @heart 04:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorry for the disgusting delay on this. :( Swarm ^X 07:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Disgusting? I followed procedure on this. Don't blame me when people complain that they don't know the template is up for deletion. Powers ^T 13:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks!....That's what the TfD page is for :) CTJF83 18:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - What? Is someone blaming you for something? The "disgusting delay" I was referring to was simply the delay in an admin getting to this request (7 hours!!!). The notice was being transcluded onto thousands of pages, including World Series-related pages at their peak viewing period, it was disrupting other templates, the discussion has received tons of participation and is snowing in favor of keep. Preventing transclusion was simply a common sense solution. Swarm ^X 20:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]