Talk:Isotopes of copper

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk

Recent corrections in the literature should probably be accompanied by a cite. For instance, my 75th Edition of the CRC gives (63)Cu's atomic weight as 62.939 which is in apparent contradiction to the 85th Edition of the CRC's value. Which is correct? A cite of the published paper correcting the value would seem to be in order here. Jim Bowery (talk) 19:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The CRC HBCP Table of the Isotopes page 11-46 mass value for Cu-63 = 62.939598 is a typo. Compare with the value on page 1-10 of 62.9295989(16). Besides the typo you can see that Dr. Holden truncated the mass instead of rounding it for 62.929599 with an unlisted uncertainty of (2) in the last digit. This value is from the 1983 Atomic Mass Evaluation as published in 1985. The values in the 85th edition are from the 1995 AME. For Cu-63 this is 62.9296011(15). The change is under 1-theta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darian2 (talkcontribs) 02:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isotopes of copper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]