Talk:Isotopes of cerium

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of cerium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Nuclear bomb fallout?

Cerium141 was made in the Trinity nuclear bomb test, and could from what I watched only be produced by a nuclear explosion. It exposed Kodak film across the country from the processing plants. I notice the page now simply says half-life and that it's 'synthetic'.

Cristiano Toàn (talk) 02:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Cerium-136 decays by electron capture to Barium-136 (Cerium-136 atomic mass 135.907172, Barium-136 atomic mass 135.9045759). Each Cerium-136 decays to barium-136 releases 2.418 MeV Cerium-138 decays by electron capture to Barium-138 (Cerium-138 atomic mass 137.905991, Barium-138 atomic mass 137.9052472). Each Cerium-138 decays to barium-138 releases 0.693 MeV

_Nagelfar (talk) 15:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

@Nagelfar: And it also has a note in the main table pointing out that Ce-141 is a fission product. Double sharp (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Possible alpha decay of ^142,144,145Ce

According to [1], ¹⁴²Ce should have an alpha decay half-life at the order of 10²⁷ years. It is likely that its alpha decay is not ignorable compared to double beta decay: [2] gives the theoretical half-life of double beta decay at the order of 10²³ years. Given the predictions, N = 84 (double beta for ¹⁴²Ce), 85 (¹⁴⁵Nd), 87 (¹⁴⁹Sm), 105 (¹⁷⁷Hf), 106 (double beta for ¹⁷⁶Yb and alpha for ¹⁷⁸Hf) and 111 (¹⁸⁷Os) would have no isotones with half-life exceeding the currently known longest half-life: 2.2×10²⁴ years for ¹²⁸Te.

¹⁴⁴Ce and ¹⁴⁵Ce have respectively an alpha decay energy of 0.41 MeV and 0.20 MeV, which is quite low, so alpha decays may be possible but with half-lives very long: at the order of 10¹¹⁸ years for ¹⁴⁵Ce given by the Geiger-Nuttall law. 2A04:CEC0:1930:1F41:6CF4:C74A:1EC0:E0D8 (talk) 02:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)