Talk:SMS Baden/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Break-up the sequence of Baden... Baden... Baden... in the Scapa Flow section.

   Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance:

   Use the chapter= for the Baden article title in Warship

   Added. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

   It was still messed up; ya gotta think of a volume of Warship as an anthology of articles, each with their own author and title. Fixed it for you regardless.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   I've added a clarification note on the beginning of the mutiny. Did the ships sail or not?

   Should be more clear now. Let me know if there's anything else I could add. Parsecboy (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: