This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
Not done for now: USA Today says "... two people with knowledge of the situation told USA TODAY Sports.", while ESPN writes "... sources told ESPN.com Sunday night." Given that a formal announcement would usually be forthcoming, we generally wait the extra day or two for something more definititve. See WP:SPORTSTRANS for more details.—Bagumba (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Michael Malone (basketball) → Michael Malone – Imagine this gets contested, and I think that is worthwhile. But, the basketball coach over the last month has averaged 1683 pageviews daily and over 52,000 total. Its median is 1431 views. Of all the pages with "Michael Malone", the basketball coach accounts for 97.9% of all pageviews. Since 5/4/23, he accounts for 97.2% of all pageviews. This, despite seven other pages. As a result, I do believe the basketball coach should have the base, non-disambiguated named for "Michael Malone". Debartolo2917 (talk) 01:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.– robertsky (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per views as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Even is we look at the last offseason, he averaged ~300 views/day [1] Recently, the next closest page titled "Michael Malone" received 11 views/day.[2]—Bagumba (talk) 08:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Seems clear cut. SportsGuy789 (talk) 15:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Pure recentism. No primary topic by long-term significance. Most people outside the US have no interest in or knowledge of American basketball. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A primary topic doesn't need to be something most people are interested in, or we'd move Basketball to Basketball (sport). Hardly, since that clearly is the primary topic! As I have said, long-term significance does not favour any of these people. Only pageviews, which is recentism. The fact that there are a lot of American basketball fans out there does not make him the primary topic, otherwise we'd be moving pretty much every person involved in American sports to primary topic status. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Necrothesp. There are 14 bulleted entries listed upon the Michael Malone disambiguation page, with little indication that the American basketball coach has worldwide prominence to such a degree that it overwhelms the combined notability of the remaining 13 men. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 01:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It might be a more compelling argument if the next Michael Malone didnt average a paltry 10 views/day. —Bagumba (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From the intial requester. I would like some clarification on why the two opposing opinions are relevant. Pageviews over a long window -- a year or even further -- shows long-term significance and is an actual, numerical, verifiable metric. Saying "no long-term significance" has no basis. And it is not close with the number of page views -- its 97.2%. Why would we wait a decade for the numbers to likely only grow and become more disparate to show "long-term significance" when the basketball coach dominates page views as extensively. Does he have to win another championship? Two? Make the hall of fame? Win Coach of the Year? It makes no sense to say pageviews over a long period is recentism, when it clearly is not. Debartolo2917 (talk) 16:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: USA Today says "... two people with knowledge of the situation told USA TODAY Sports.", while ESPN writes "... sources told ESPN.com Sunday night." Given that a formal announcement would usually be forthcoming, we generally wait the extra day or two for something more definititve. See WP:SPORTSTRANS for more details.—Bagumba (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
