Talk:Anushtegin Gharchai

Untitled

From the Talk:Khwarezmian Empire page:

“ According to a legend, the name Anush was for one of the first people in the Earth, who was a son of Shith and grandson of Adam (look: Abu Hanifa ad-Dinawari, p. 3). Khusraw I Anushirwan had been named anushak-ruban, what means in Pahlawi “of Immortal Spirit”. His son with his Chriatian wife had been named Anusha-zadh, i.e. the descendent of Anusha. Look: Browne E.G. A Literary History of Persia, pр. 107, 135, 181, 168. The same name had the ancestor of Khwarizmshahs dynasty Anush-tegin Garcha’i (ruled in 1077 - 1097). Look: Buniyatov Z.M. Gosudarstvo khorezmshahov-Anushteginidov, p. 223. ”

Tājik 12:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

@ Baristarim

Why do you want to push for the term "Turkic"?! What's important is NOT is Turkic background, but his origins as a slave! At that time, entire Central Asia was gouverned by Turks ... what's the big deal?!

Tājik 11:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Compromise?

Dear Tajik, Who compromised with whom. I can not see any consensus about your alleges about origin/history/name.. all. Come here and discuss if you dont agree. This is our history, bring your sources if you insist in your alleges. Regards. Must^TC 17:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Sources have been presented, and the compromise was with User:Baristarim and User:Ro4444. Tājik 18:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)