Talk:2019 Q School/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 15:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


As promised, I'll be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 15:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

  • Organised by World Snooker, entries for the event cost £1,000 and there was no maximum number of participants. Would suggest rewording, as currently the opening clause "Organised by World Snooker" describes the subject "entries", where I think you mean that the event was organised by the association.
  • "Each event was open to an unlimited amount of entrants" is redundant to the sentence that came before. Removing it will also allow the first paragraph to be entirely in past-tense, and the second to be entirely in present-tense.
  • Change the comma after "Twelve players qualified from the events" to a colon.
  • Those "Four more players" should be around parentheticals, or otherwise reordered to allow for punctuation

Format

Summary

Order of Merit

  • The header is capitalized, whereas the term "order of merit" in the section is not. If not a proper title, would suggest changing it to "Order of merit" per MOS:SECTIONCAPS

References

  • Change [2] from all-caps to title case, per MOS:ALLCAPS

General comments

  • No pictures are included, so criteria are not applicable
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks good at 7.4%

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Ping me if there are any questions. — GhostRiver 15:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]