Talk:1972–1979 (album)
(Redirected from Talk:1972–1979)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
1972–1979 → 1972–1979 (album) – WP:RECOGNIZABILITY, see Talk:1917–1987 etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- FYI, 1972–1979 (Vol. 2). Both appear to lack an assertion of notability and do not appear at first glance to meet WP:NALBUMS. At this point, I suggest redirection. Dekimasuよ! 06:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Do something to fix the ambiguity: "1972–1979" is too ambiguous. Even someone familiar with the topic would be highly unlikely to refer to that topic name without some other text nearby to clarify the meaning. To the average reader, the expectation would be that an article about "1972–1979" would be a discussion of a span of time. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support, per the outcome of recent discussion at WP:AT (and various other places): that titles consisting only of date ranges merit clarification. ╠╣uw [talk] 14:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.