File talk:Frankish Empire 481 to 814-en.svg

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Serbs were never tributary to the Franks. Awesome map though Hxseek (talk) 10:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the map. FYI, some people (like me) can't distinguish such similar shades of green.

Please REMOVE serbs from the map. They did not exist in the territory of the Croats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.165.13.40 (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemians

Please correct the reference to Czechs. Instead it should refer to the Bohemians. There were no Czechs at that time, just Bohemian tribes of Slavic origin. Thank you.--IDO487 (talk) 13:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carinthia =

Please REMOVE this map!! Carinthia did not exist in year 788!!!! IT WAS CARANTANIA!!!!! This map is FAKE!


It is not a "fake". Carinthia is a derivative of purest Slovenian title of "Koroška" or Korotan which was original (native) name for "Carantania"; which was a latin transliteration. Just like is a "Druid" or "Amazon" a Greek transliteration of totally different origin of the word. If it was written "Carantania" it does not mean it was called that way by the Slavic or better said ancestors of Slovenes (according to Freising manuscripts we are dealing with Slovene language and no "Church Slavic language"). For example; according to Thomas Jefferson who quoted Jean Bodin, their (Carinthian) Slavic law was called "Institutio Sclavenica Lex" (in Latin); but in Slovene sounded as "Rota" (the remain in Slovene is "porota" (jury); where "po" stands for something which is "nearby" or "after"(literaly).

Rise of the Frankish Empire

In the English version of the box entitled "Rise of the Frankish Empire", there is a misspelling, an extra "i" in the line, "Dependent territoiries" Vereverde (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible colors

These shades of green are almost impossible to distinguish.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.58.246.135 (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Provence: 736 or 536?

In the image the Provence is shown with the year 736, but should that not be the year 536? Tony Mach (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did Austrasia really stretch to the coast?

I have posted about this on the Austrasia talk page.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]