File:Comparison between JPEG, JPEG 2000 and JPEG XR.png

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,600 × 480 pixels, file size: 1.19 MB, MIME type: image/png)

This file is from a shared repository and may be used by other projects. The description on its file description page there is shown below.

Summary

Description
English:

This is a comparison between JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and JPEG. I used Paint.NET and IrfanView to create this picture. The original photo is cropped out of a very large JPEG and is saved as a PNG file. Then, this PNG version is converted to each of the aforementioned picture file formats. Each photo is 400x480 in size.

The basic JPEG is the worst at compression but JPEG XR and JPEG 2000 are very similar. The JPEG 2000 is a bit on the brighter side and tends to do a better job at blending the pixels. The black areas in the JPEG XR develop a checkerboard pattern when zoomed in.

Date (UTC)
Source File:Paris Night.jpg
Author

Licensing

GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

Original upload log

The original description page was here. All following user names refer to en.wikipedia.
  • 2012-10-31 21:36 JeffyP 1600×480× (1166145 bytes) Always small with pngout :P
  • 2011-07-13 05:49 Skubasteve834 1600×480× (1195529 bytes) Used OptimizePNG to make the PNG file go from 1.8MB to 1.1MB to save Wikipedia bandwidth.
  • 2011-03-23 02:44 Skubasteve834 1600×480× (1936204 bytes) moved lettering
  • 2011-03-22 22:05 Skubasteve834 1600×480× (1936204 bytes) {{Information |Description = This is a comparison between Jpeg XR, Jpeg 2000, and Jpeg. I tried to compress the photos as close as possible to 7KB but paint.net and infranview are not exact. The basic jpeg was the worst at compression but Jpeg XR and
  • 2011-03-22 22:01 Skubasteve834 1600×480× (1936204 bytes) {{Information |Description = This is a comparison between Jpeg 2000, Jpeg XR, and Jpeg. I used paint.net and infranview to create this picture. The basic jpeg was the worst at compression but Jpeg XR and 2000 were very similar. The Jpeg 2000 is a b

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Items portrayed in this file

depicts

22 March 2011

image/png

8d3534f62071718c7d7830fad256e4daac66805e

1,246,034 byte

480 pixel

1,600 pixel

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current11:05, 2 April 2019Thumbnail for version as of 11:05, 2 April 20191,600 × 480 (1.19 MB)commons>Kulandru morupdated JPEG sample using decoder post-processing described in A. Nosratinia: Enhancement of JPEG-Compressed Images by Re-application of JPEG (https://utdallas.edu/~aria/papers/vlsisp99.pdf)

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata