Talk:Albrecht Ritschl

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theology section inappropriately labeled

This is far too critical to be considered simply description of Ritschl's theology. Some of this criticism should be relocated to a new section of the article and the theology section should be reworked.

Pfsoupy (talk) 06:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Albrecht Ritschl/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Aside from a phrase from the Catholic Encyclopaedia, it is mostly based on Britannica and needs information from another source. It needs an infobox. It has a portrait and is well linked and classified. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

frank foster

"In 1909 Duhm, who had been a pupil and follower of Ritschl, declared to the writer that there were no longer any Ritschlians there." Frank Hugh Foster, The Modern Movement in American Theology, 1935, p. 186