User talk:Wrweewfw

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clashes around Zujince (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Plenty of MOS violations are present in the article. Please fix.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kline • talk • contribs 20:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wrweewfw! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kline • talk • contribs 20:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Wrweewfw, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Attack on Teslić to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 18:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Slavko Lisica. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Storming of the presidential palace in Grozny has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

Destruction of Chechen aviation moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Destruction of Chechen aviation. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Star

Do NOT replace an existing, legitimate article with your own material, which should be named Operation Star 94 anyway. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I moved that new article to Operation Star 94. Clarityfiend is correct: every different topic, even with same name, gets its own page and you cannot simply erase an existing page: WP:OVERWRITE is not allowed. DMacks (talk) 02:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Offensive on Kijevo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Offensive on Kijevo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Offensives on Velika Kladuša moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Offensives on Velika Kladuša. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 21:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks on Lučane moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Attacks on Lučane. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Trešnjevo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Trešnjevo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 15:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain on making new articles

I have viewed most of your articles that you have recently created, and some have grammatical and spelling errors, while others lack comprehension. I greatly appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, but you are making these new articles rather rashly, without giving actual time to thoroughly recheck for grammatical errors or on the sources? I seriously recommend you to stop adding anymore new articles and start to improve the existing ones. Thank you. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 15:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yugoslav–Albanian border conflict (1998–1999) has been accepted

Yugoslav–Albanian border conflict (1998–1999), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 13:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

I enjoy that you contribute a lot to Wikipedia, although you seem insanely biased when it comes to what pages you decide to make. You along with another guy have managed to infest the Bosnian War with Republika Srpska victories without even trying to add a single Bosnian victory. Make all the pages you want, but this is borderline spreading propaganda at this point exaggerating Republika Srpska's dominance in the Bosnian War. Setergh (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Angela (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdann52 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mdann52 (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Frost. I noticed that in this edit to Battle of Lisača, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Frost (talk) 09:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, m sorry. I didn't know how to delete a page correctly so i did it that way. Didnt know it was harmfull. The wiki page has non-reliable sources and is badly written and isnt ready to be its own Article. I think it should be made a draft or be deleted. Again im sorry for my mistake. Thank you Wrweewfw (talk) 09:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Wrweewfw"