User talk:Relvojtax0

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hi Relvojtax0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Lionel Cristiano? 20:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Relvojtax0 (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Uherské Hradiště, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ternera (talk) 20:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apple Pencil Pro (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Topic is notable though, add sources and it will be accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ToadetteEdit! 14:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Relvojtax0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit! 14:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apple Pencil Pro (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As Toadette said, please add sufficient sources, and it will likely be accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Guessitsavis! Do you mean that i should add more information with sufficient sources or do i just put the links of the sufficient sources i used? Relvojtax0 (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources" Ive used official apple's website, that is a reliable source when its their own product... Relvojtax0 (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apple Pencil Pro has been accepted

Apple Pencil Pro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grabup (talk) 17:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oldgen (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Shadow311 (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, i understand. Relvojtax0 (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bo sinn (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bo sinn (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bo sinn has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bo sinn. Thanks! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bo sinn (June 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vivo V5 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vivo V5. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenton Harrison Tarrant (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flemmish Nietzsche was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Christchurch mosque shootings instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We already have more content about the subject in the perpetrator section of the Christchurch mosque shootings article. There was already a deletion discussion and a RfC where consensus was reached to merge the content of the Brenton Tarrant article into the shooting article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dockware (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 15:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dockware

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Dockware, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Relvojtax0"