User talk:Rager7

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mazhar Khan (disambiguation) (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mazhar Khan (disambiguation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Rager7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mazhar Khan (disambiguation)

Hello, Rager7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mazhar Khan (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mazhar Khan (disambiguation)

Hello, Rager7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mazhar Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

No worries, there's already a disambiguation for it. Rager7 (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Rager7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Please be sure to check out the Manual of Style as well. In particular, you have made a lot of edits where you have simply shortened something with a contraction. Per WP:N'T, do not do this. Kimen8 (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh, I see I didn't know there was a rule against certain types of contractions. Rager7 (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Not a problem. Also, another article should only be linked to once (with exceptions); this is also in the manual of style (WP:LINKONCE). Kimen8 (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Got it, there are rules of linking too. Rager7 (talk) 20:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

More re linking

Hello, please don't link to countries or other commonly known words, per the Manual of Style on overlinking, as you did at John Kestel. If you continue to not obey basic Manual of Style rules, you may be blocked. Graham87 (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

On further review of your edits, I noticed this one to Bothwell Road Park, where you added a contraction despite being specifically advised against doing so above. We can not have users who are unresponsive to feedback here. I will mass-rollback your edits. Graham87 (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

In this edit you made to Charter of Saint Petersburg (probably a very bad translation from Russian), honestly neither version makes sense. If you really think "are" is an appropriate word to describe something that happened in 1998, you lack the competence to edit the English Wikipedia. Graham87 (talk) 05:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I tend to act impulsively. I'll try to not to overedit next time. Rager7 (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rager7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To the administrator that may be reading this, I wanted to preface this by saying that this is not a justification for my previous behavior about six months ago. Any mention to past behavior is simply an explanation of why I did it and not a defense. With that being clear, I wanted to say that I'm sorry and regretted my actions. In which I kept violating a policy. The policy being in which to not overlink words, the reason why I kept doing it despite being warned was I thought I was improving the website. However, the action conflicts with the policies and rules of this website. Hence, I was subsequently blocked for that act. While I was blocked, I read more about Wikipedia’s guidelines and started to learn what is acceptable and what isn’t on this website. Which gave me a better understanding on what to do and how to edit properly. My impulsiveness, naivety as being a new editor, and lack of understanding of the rules created a mess that had to be fixed. In which I now apologize for, so with that being said, my future plans once unblocked would be to continue making edits for history and political articles and making such edits that don’t conflict or violate the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for your understanding. Rager7 (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=To the administrator that may be reading this, I wanted to preface this by saying that this is not a justification for my previous behavior about six months ago. Any mention to past behavior is simply an explanation of why I did it and not a defense. With that being clear, I wanted to say that I'm sorry and regretted my actions. In which I kept violating a policy. The policy being in which to not overlink words, the reason why I kept doing it despite being warned was I thought I was improving the website. However, the action conflicts with the policies and rules of this website. Hence, I was subsequently blocked for that act. While I was blocked, I read more about Wikipedia’s guidelines and started to learn what is acceptable and what isn’t on this website. Which gave me a better understanding on what to do and how to edit properly. My impulsiveness, naivety as being a new editor, and lack of understanding of the rules created a mess that had to be fixed. In which I now apologize for, so with that being said, my future plans once unblocked would be to continue making edits for history and political articles and making such edits that don’t conflict or violate the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for your understanding. [[User:Rager7|Rager7]] ([[User talk:Rager7#top|talk]]) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=To the administrator that may be reading this, I wanted to preface this by saying that this is not a justification for my previous behavior about six months ago. Any mention to past behavior is simply an explanation of why I did it and not a defense. With that being clear, I wanted to say that I'm sorry and regretted my actions. In which I kept violating a policy. The policy being in which to not overlink words, the reason why I kept doing it despite being warned was I thought I was improving the website. However, the action conflicts with the policies and rules of this website. Hence, I was subsequently blocked for that act. While I was blocked, I read more about Wikipedia’s guidelines and started to learn what is acceptable and what isn’t on this website. Which gave me a better understanding on what to do and how to edit properly. My impulsiveness, naivety as being a new editor, and lack of understanding of the rules created a mess that had to be fixed. In which I now apologize for, so with that being said, my future plans once unblocked would be to continue making edits for history and political articles and making such edits that don’t conflict or violate the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for your understanding. [[User:Rager7|Rager7]] ([[User talk:Rager7#top|talk]]) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=To the administrator that may be reading this, I wanted to preface this by saying that this is not a justification for my previous behavior about six months ago. Any mention to past behavior is simply an explanation of why I did it and not a defense. With that being clear, I wanted to say that I'm sorry and regretted my actions. In which I kept violating a policy. The policy being in which to not overlink words, the reason why I kept doing it despite being warned was I thought I was improving the website. However, the action conflicts with the policies and rules of this website. Hence, I was subsequently blocked for that act. While I was blocked, I read more about Wikipedia’s guidelines and started to learn what is acceptable and what isn’t on this website. Which gave me a better understanding on what to do and how to edit properly. My impulsiveness, naivety as being a new editor, and lack of understanding of the rules created a mess that had to be fixed. In which I now apologize for, so with that being said, my future plans once unblocked would be to continue making edits for history and political articles and making such edits that don’t conflict or violate the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for your understanding. [[User:Rager7|Rager7]] ([[User talk:Rager7#top|talk]]) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}