User talk:RaeLVRN

Welcome!

Hello, RaeLVRN, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:RaeLVRN/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RaeLVRN/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:RaeLVRN/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IRMedia IR & Digital Communications IRMedia (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IRMedia IR & Digital Communications IRMedia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RaeLVRN! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:IRMedia IR & Digital Communications IRMedia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IRMedia IR & Digital Communications IRMedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear community, I am new to Wikipedia and made a mistake: I tried posting an article just to test the format but it ended up being published on the platform if I manage to understand that correctly. My intention for Wikipedia are to use the platform to write about people and subjects that are of public interest and not to advertise. I have in the past contributes several article to Wikipedia but that was over 15 years ago and I totally forgot how to use the platform technically. I'm grateful you have moved my mistakes to be deleted quickly an I am committed to adhering to the community's principals and guidelines from now on. Please could you unblock me? RaeLVRN (talk) 08:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the typos, this is very stressful and upsetting for me to find out. Thanks again. RaeLVRN (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody will sea your pleas (unless they just happen to be watching your talk page); if you wish your appeal to be considered, you must format it as shown in the block notice, so that it appears on the administrators' feed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! This platform is super confusing for me to learn, I hope to get the hang of it quickly enough and especially to not make further mistakes. RaeLVRN (talk) 09:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RaeLVRN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here RaeLVRN (talk) 09:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You weren't just testing the format. Come on now. This was blatant promotion. Nor have you addressed your apparent violation of WP:COI. Nothing here convinces me you'd stop trying to spam about IRMedia and its clients. Yamla (talk) 09:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear community, I am new to Wikipedia and made a mistake: I tried posting an article just to test the format and to understand the platform but it ended up being published on the platform if I manage to understand that correctly. My intention for Wikipedia are to use the platform to write about people and subjects that are of public interest and not to advertise. I have in the past contributes several article to Wikipedia but that was over 15 years ago and I totally forgot how to use the platform. I'm grateful you have moved my mistakes to be deleted quickly. I am not about advertising but about value and information, and I am committed to adhering to the community's principals and guidelines always. Please could you unblock me this is super stressful and upsetting for me? RaeLVRN (talk) 08:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]