User talk:Procyon117

January 2024

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Falam language—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 07:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fausto Coppi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fausto Coppi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fausto Coppi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fausto Coppi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Connely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Connely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Connely until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sadustu Tau. Thank you for your work on NGC 4383. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

William Douglas, 1st Earl of March moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to William Douglas, 1st Earl of March. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyedit Tag

Hi sadustu Tau, I recently edited an article named Babu Singh Kushwaha. Just wanted to know what are the changes I should make since you added a copyedit tag.

Thankyou. Diksha1805 (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

All it needs is a few minor edits, such as missing punctuation, some words that shouldn't be capitalised, and a few missing words. There aren't too many, but they are there. A few spaces are also missing. Sadustu Tau (talk) 16:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay I’ll make those changes.

Thankyou for your help. Diksha1805 (talk) 13:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

No worries. If you need me to help out I can as well. Sadustu Tau (talk) 18:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I edited the article again, please check it. I also added some information I found on google.Can you also tell me how to protect an article on wikipedia.

Thankyou. Diksha1805 (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I'll have a look when I next wake up. Also unless the page is being vandalised and disrupted it doesn't need protecting. Administrators can protect pages but they most likely won't do it since there's been no disruption in over a month. Procyon117 (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response (also seems like someone beat me to some of it and removed the copyedit tag), but I finally got around to copyediting and fixing some stuff that was missed. Procyon117 (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry

I did not intend to publish that edit. I am sorry for causing you extra work. Thank you for fixing it Cannolorosa (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

No worries. I was just confused because I was just on that article a few minutes ago. I made sure to double check though before reverting. Sadustu Tau (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Hur-e Pasefid

Hello, I am editing from Kerman, and Hajazi was incorporated in the city of Hur-e Pasefid, which is in our province in my country, and I am aware of it, and reliable sources also confirm my claim. However, your lack of cooperation will not change the main issue. did Arman.Farsi57 (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

No, it's not my "lack of cooperation", it's you removing sourced information and introducing a redirect for some reason. The article also says that Hajazi was incorporated into Hur-e Pasefid anyway. Moreover, the article refers to it as being a former village and that it is in past tense. I do not see what the problem is. Sadustu Tau (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Your contributions towards dealing with the Indian army problem are very helpful. 👍 JBW (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! First time dealing with something this big so good to know I'm doing a good job. Procyon117 (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm Drmies. An edit that you recently made to Epos Now seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please provide a reason when you revert. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about that I accidentally pressed enter before realising I didn't type anything in the edit summary. Will be more careful next time! Procyon117 (talk) 14:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Checking for older MP designations before creating new named-MP redirects

FYI 20992 Marypearse (and a few others that I'm going through now) have older designations, in this case (20992) 1985 RV2, which should have been moved to 20992 Marypearse, instead of creating a new #R. The newest designation's page/#R is what holds all the relevant categories, and all older designations should use {{NASTRO comment|do-not-cat=yes}}, and (usually) {{R avoided double redirect}}, for example (20992) 1985 RV2 now.

I am, of course, guilty of this as well...!   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  16:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Noted. Procyon117 (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 14:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes Improvement Time!

Hello there! I am sending this alert to all members of the WikiProject Weather and editors who have recently edited in the realm of tornadoes.

There is a large and important discussion ongoing, with the goal to completely overhaul and improve the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes. The previous improvement attempt back in 2022/2023 gained almost no participation. This alert is being sent out so these discussions hopefully gain a reasonably-sized participation, so the F5/EF5 tornado article, one of the most viewed weather-related articles on Wikipedia, can be improved for all readers!

If you wish to participate, please visit: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Possible F5/EF5/IF5 tornadoes. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 16:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)