User talk:Mark Webberfan100

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DigimonAndF1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JonChappleTalk 08:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DigimonAndF1 with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. My76Strat (talk) 08:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Jonchapple with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. My76Strat (talk) 08:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Jonchapple with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. My76Strat (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:My76Strat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JonChappleTalk 08:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of "Jon Chapple"

A page you created, Jon Chapple, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 08:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agathoclea (talk) 08:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mark Webberfan100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i was blocked for inserting true information on the origins of digimon and mark webber, both from canada. however, <personal attacks redacted> -Mark Webberfan100 (talk)

Decline reason:

Utterly hopeless unblock request. Declined and talk page access removed. EyeSerenetalk 09:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.