User talk:Daniel/Archive/72

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page.

← Archive 71 · Archive 72 · Archive 73 →

Big Sonic Heaven

Thanks for taking a look at the Big Sonic Heaven page deletion I'd asked about! Also, sorry if this isn't the place to drop a note of thanks. :) LesOrchard (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing evidence of closed case

Is this allowed after the case is closed?[1] -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nu j00zerpage

u has wun. [ roux ] [x] 00:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OMG... Since when has the anti-userpage warrior/bureaucrat changed into one of the 80%-of-my-edits-are-to-the-userpage people he has long detested o.O —Dark ^talk 09:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*gathers up evidence before Daniel spears him with his Mariners bullshit* —Dark ^talk 09:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

Please refrain from discussing me on IRC in future, I regard all logs mentioning my name to be completely fair game and my own property. Giano (talk) 18:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you missed the sarcasm and irony of my comments, but oh well. By the way, they aren't your own property, as I maintain copyright over everything I say in there. So they are not "your property". Daniel (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well let's hope you never cause me to put that to the test, in the meantine stop gossiping about those that are trying to write this project. Giano (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a courtesy note – you are being discussed at WP:ANI#IRC#Admins' Abuse. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had a look at this and frankly I am disgusted. You have the temerity to officiate at this and remove some of my statement with a pompous reason that it was against the rules - which prompted me to take no part and then I discover you are considerably worse than even my biggest enemies would say I was ... I presume now that your true character has been outed you will ask for my case to be reconsidered? Abtract (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I presume now that your true character has been outed" Funnily enough, I always thought civility was a policy on Wikipedia. —Dark ^talk 06:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have a point to make?Abtract (talk) 15:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. It seemed you missed it though... —Dark ^talk 07:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you understand the back story before making your point? If it was important you'd better make it in plain English cos I am a bit thick. 18:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)~~

I know the back story perfectly well thanks. As for my point, I did make it in plain English. —Dark ^talk 06:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest not continuing this conversation. Inter-fighting is a waste of everybody's time. AGK 07:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies; especially since I agree that civility is a policy and one which I adhere to. Abtract (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #22

The October issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 02:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your IRC Block

Regarding your IRC Block and its conditions, please be aware that I do not want an apology, it would stick in your throat and cause bile in mine. I would imagine being banned form #Admins is more of a holiday than a sanction, but I expect on past form the sanction will be minutes rather than days or weeks. Funnily enough, I don't really blame you, you must see so much such behaviour there I expect you thought it was the acceptable norm. The people I blame are the channels leaders, the FT2s of this world who when appointed by the Arbcom to investigate the deplorable state of affairs that exists there. Yet having carried out this investigation, in February, assured us all that the channel was properly regulated. It is not regulated at all. If it was this painful situation would not have arisen. We have an Arbcom comprised of #Admins asking other senior #Admins to investigate it and report their findings. It was always going to be whitewash and stitch up, and as usual it is the community who pays the price. Giano (talk) 13:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Minar-e-Pakistan.jpg

Thank you uploading this, image. However because of planned licensing changes in Wikipedia, it would be appreciated if you could consider dual licensing the image under the terms of the GFDL 1.3 and CC-BY-SA 3.0 license.

As on OTRS ticket exists for the image concerned it should not be hard to contact the original copyright holder, to request a change in the licensing.

Dual-licensing assists those wishing to make use of images and media on other WMFprojects, and off wiki. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hint

Hi Daniel, could you please have a look at your otrs-wiki user page? Work is waiting or you ;) --Lyzzy (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Just wanted to write the same thing. Thank you, --Elitre (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

RFC discussion of User:Privatemusings

A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of Privatemusings (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Privatemusings. -- MBisanz ^talk 01:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Daniel/Archive/72's Day!

User:Daniel/Archive/72 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Daniel/Archive/72's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Daniel/Archive/72!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:EVula/Userboxes/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Wikimedian :-)

Whilst it's quite likely you'll have heard this news on the grapevine, in your email inbox, or even in person - I thought that it was sufficiently exciting to warrant giving each of you a 'new messages' orange bar! This particular orange bar has been brought to you to let you know that Wikimedia Australia is now open for members!

I'm not on the committee or anything, and that's where the credit is due in getting everything to this point, but I think it would be absolutely fantastic for folks who wish to support the australian wiki community, to go ahead and sign up - we're quite likely to be the world's fatest growing chapter at the moment! Join Us :-)

Here's a little more about membership, and the mailing list in particular is well worth signing up to as well, and is a good forum to get answers to any questions answered, or to share any ideas. I've dropped these notes in under my own steam, and you've received one because you're on this list - feel free to ask me any questions, or anything - I can certainly point you in the right direction :-) cheers all, Privatemusings (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

we're quite likely to be the world's fatest growing chapter at the moment? Good lord, we've overtaken the US O.O —Dark ^talk 06:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New

Hi Daniel, I've sent you a Email. SteelersFan94 06:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied, IDK what your talking about could you explain please what I "leaked"? Thanks. SteelersFan-9 4 19:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Bjørn Sagvolden.

Hi Daniel, I just wanted to inform you of an interesting article : Bjørn Sagvolden. And, have a nice day. E92f+ (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sju Hav

Is at it again as User:Sju Hav 1122.Inge (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI [2] Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 14:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 42	8 November 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
News and notes: The Price is Right, milestones	Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 43	10 November 2008	About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens: Over $500,000 raised in first week	ArbCom elections: Nominations open
Book review: How Wikipedia Works	MediaWiki search engine improved
Four Board resolutions, including financials, approved	News and notes: Vietnamese Wiki Day
Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 44	17 November 2008	About the Signpost

Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de	GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license
Wikimedia Events Roundup	News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leon Ousby AfD

I see you blanked one, are you going to do the other one and the two MfDs? As someone who has been regularly playing whack a mole from his socks who made a mess of my user page, I'd apreciate someone looking at the SSP and blocking as appropriate. I also think whichever sock requested the blanking should be added to the report. Thanks. StarM 13:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Morwell National Park; Central Districts Stags; Mornington Peninsula National Park; Lower Glenelg National Park; Great Australian Bight Marine Park; Mount Eccles National Park; Mount Richmond National Park; Terrick Terrick National Park; Lake Eyre National Park; Malayer; Brisbane Ranges National Park; Chiltern-Mt Pilot National Park; Mole Creek Karst National Park; Coalition Military Assistance Training Team; Coopracambra National Park; Savage River National Park; Dandenong Ranges National Park; Kinglake National Park; Félag íslenskra þjóðernissinna

Cleanup: Pooh's Heffalump Movie; Aaron Friedberg; Residence park
Merge: Mount Field National Park; Suwarrow; Race (United States Census)
Add Sources: Sunnyside, Staten Island; Binational state; Alpine National Park
Wikify: Vilseck; Rafik Khachatryan; Percy Sparks
Expand: Palm Island, Queensland; Calderdale; Exposé (journalism)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:vote

Yeah, sorry. I had just got home and my mind was on something else. Thanks for letting me know. Burner0718 ^Wutsapnin? 04:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/LNER Peppercorn Class A1

I am trying to list this for mediation but I cannot find the "Submit query" button. Biscuittin (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUS 200 GA drive

Hi Daniel. Per last year, we are now closing in on another milestone for AUS, with 178 current GAs. Well, since you participated in the GA drive last year, this is another rallying cry to WP:AWNB/A. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 03:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SMH

You're quoted here --Step hen 08:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ta. Daniel (talk) 06:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use

Sometimes you have to apply WP:IAR. The information here is exceptionally valuable in the context of the page, to show how the largest number of people in the UK will have been exposed to the story. Jheald (talk) 12:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IAR doesn't overrule the Foundation's fair use licensing resolution, sorry. The Foundation is sovereign even above any Wikipedia policy, including ignore all rules. It clearly defines the limits as "articles". Daniel (talk) 12:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & an apology

Thanks for the very quick change to that last comment - and for your work for OTRS too. I didn't mean to sound picky about flaunt/flout but I now see it would have come across that way so I am sorry for that too. I hope you get a good night's rest, best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 13:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit over all this to be honest - although submitting a complaint about Amazon's hosting with an angry message about consistency was a highlight :) Daniel (talk) 13:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again - I do really appreciate what you have been doing, it's hugely encouraging to see that others care so much. DuncanHill (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military cross issue

Daniel - Something interesting has come to my attention about this one. Have you done a google search on the names involved in that OTRS ticket? There is a possible COI concern here; this probably requires some more indepth research. In the interests of confidentiality of the OTRS system, I hesitate to say more on your page; however, some alarm bells are going off here. Feel free email me if you require more detail or are having difficulty finding what I am talking about. Risker (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, the decision by oversight was to go through and oversight the edits due to the compelling case presented in the OTRS ticket. Daniel (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice, we've solved the problem today. Will we hammer down on the next editor who happens to notice that there's an "error" in the list a few months from now? The other name is well publicised, unfortunately, in both online and hard copy, so someone at some time is bound to notice the discrepancy and try to re-add the other name. Sad part is that this only comes to pass when his book is published under his "new" name; it doesn't seem to have been an issue until then, but in fact makes it more likely that someone's going to start digging and wondering why our list doesn't match the gold-standard reference source. It's a solution, but it's one that is impermanent at best. Risker (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it's not a 100% perfect solution, but it'll have to do. Oversight people and OTRS volunteers are watching the page and will deal with any readditions as they come in a measured and AGF manner. Daniel (talk) 03:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bluemarine

Hi Daniel, regarding this archiving edit. In the clerks area, Tznkai had said that the request was on hold pending clarification of who was in control of the account. It looked like no arbitrators had weighed in since Thatcher posted his note confirming that the account had, at the time of his check, been compromised. Did you receive other guidance about this that prompted you to archive the request? Avruch^T 17:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see Durova's last comment in her section, one hour after Tznkai's comment. Daniel (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled]

Hi Daniel,

I do not clearly understand why you have deleted my article regarding the Gueroust Family.

I am on descendent of the de Gueroust Family and I Know very well my proven genealogy.

It is why I am convinced the Dona Concepcion Heredia Rosa story is a joke.

Charly

charly (talk) 21:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where? Daniel (talk) 12:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Snowded

Nope, didn't mean to remove that one; thanks for catching it. Kirill ^(prof) 06:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nps. Daniel (talk) 12:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP India

Thanks for fixing that. To be honest, I didn't check the change Ncmvocalist made, seemed like he had it under control. Apparently I was wrong. Sorry you had to clean up the mess. l'aquatique || talk 11:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, anytime. Daniel (talk) 12:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

_David ^WS _(contribs) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy holidays! _David ^WS _(contribs) 19:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Daniel (talk) 12:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thankspam

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.

Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message!

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge Talk^Contribs, 17:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]