User talk:Benjaminzyg9402

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 2017

Hello, I'm Zawl. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SCP Foundation, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Zawl 10:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Coronet Bay, Victoria. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Zawl 10:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –72 (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So my family can use it. Sorry for that false edit and I am quite new. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 21:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The autoblock will expire in 24 hours, as long as you don't try to edit anything. But I see no reason to unblock this account; there's wasn't even an attempt at legitimate use of Wikipedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19321 was submitted on Sep 23, 2017 22:07:40. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Otherwise my family cannot upload new image

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  10:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I need help

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 09:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

WHY I CANNOT BE UNBLOCKED I WAITED FOR WEEKS BUT STILL BLOCKED. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LAST CHANCE TO UNBLOCK ME

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

(no reason given)

Decline reason:

You need to show that you're able and willing to follow guidelines before an unblock will even be considered. —C.Fred (talk) 03:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok I give up

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed the reasons for your block. Indeed, your use of this page has shown it would be totally inappropriate to unblock you. Yamla (talk) 10:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will follow to guildeline and won’t do it again. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the admin to investigate the cause

JamesbWatson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) abusing the block system which I didn’t do it but I told him I just promised to fix the edit like John Xena did which is new and I am new but he abused it.. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC) Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh

I am so sorry C.Fred, I will try and fix the problem I caused. I wish to be unblocked but sigh. 😪😪😪 it wont help me get into s better place but a unblock will help me cheer me up. I already have therapy about it but the administration need to support the disability needs which is a great thing. Again I was saying I am so sorry. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We are not here to cheer you up or provide support. We are an encyclopedia. When an editor removes material from articles and otherwise disrupts the project, their account is blocked to prevent further disruption. That is what happened to your account.
The only way to get your account unblocked is to show that you understand the rules and guidelines, and that you are willing and capable of following them. A properly-constructed unblock request isn't required, but it helps. So does waiting more than a week after your block. (The "standard offer" suggests waiting six months before requesting an unblock.)
In all candor, your posts this morning have probably done more to hurt your chances of being unblocked than helped them. —C.Fred (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok here the deal if you unblock me right now+new administration enforcement rules.

I will stop the editing which is a major concern plus the administration should not be that strictly about users and block. Because there one major concern about those administration is BLOCK AND IP ADDRESS ABUSE. Because if administration fails to comply within those rules will be punishment and there are 3 punishable for that: 1. Removal of the administration and be blocked within the IP located 2. Banned from Wikipedia 3.Deletion of account.

Because there is some administration is abusing their power onto a new users account and making fun of them. Please stay aware of those administration and report it to me or the Wikipedia administration if they broke those written rules. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Granted to be unblocked

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Save.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

{{Help me|There is no admin to help me being unblocked and they are keeping declining me Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)}} Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We can't help with that. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage access revoked

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Yunshui  10:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19380 was submitted on Sep 29, 2017 18:59:41. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Benjaminzyg9402 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19503 was submitted on Oct 15, 2017 22:31:12. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]