User talk:109.106.227.13

January 2019

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Caesium— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm ComplexRational. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In this particular case, attribution to a reliable source is of heightened importance, because there are other sources (e.g. {{NUBASE 2016 II}}) that clearly state the opposite claim, i.e. that the α-decay of Ru-98 is energetically impossible. Please be mindful of this in future edits. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Strontium-90. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ComplexRational. Your recent edit to the page Strontium-90 appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 00:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Isotopes of vanadium. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I would like your feedback regarding these changes at WT:ELEM#Recent edits to isotope pages. ComplexRational (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Isotopes of neodymium. I invite you to explain your edits or provide a source for your changes, otherwise they will be considered non-constructive at best. As you have chosen not to heed any previous warnings or respond at any relevant talk page (yours, mine, WT:ELEM, or those of the articles), this is your last warning, and you may be blocked if you continue to ignore these messages and make such changes without providing a source or explanation. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019

Hello, I'm AryanTheArticleArtist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 8000 (number)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ★AɾყαɳTԋҽAɾƚιƈʅҽAɾƚιʂƚ★ ✉ 20:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)