Template talk:Korean diaspora

Edits in February 2007

About recent changes to this template:

This template is not about "Koreans and people in Korea"; the whole point is that every group mentioned are OUTSIDE of Korea
The "name" parameter of the template has to match the actual page name, otherwise the "edit" button of the template would be broken
There is no continent called "Middle East" nor are the Arab countries collectively referred to as "Arabia" in this century.
Templates should point to the actual page names and not redirects, so that when using the template for navigation, the current page's name is displayed in bold
There are no such names as "Korean Sakhalinians", "Korean Arabians", or whatever other nonsense has been made up in the name of "standardisation"
The North and South American continents are referred to collectively as "The Americas", not "America"
The "group/list" function of the navbox should be used to cluster similar items, instead of using ugly manual headers and linebreaks
{{·}} does not need a space before it

See other templates of a similar type like {{Iraqi diaspora}}, {{Overseas Vietnamese}}, etc. for best-practise examples. Regards, cab (talk) 00:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They deserve their own article- it's larger than the communities in Spain or Poland (both of which have articles). 99.27.108.59 (talk) 01:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not a topic "deserves" an article is not determined by size but by coverage in reliable sources. Please see WP:N and WP:BIGNUMBER. cab (talk) 01:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone find reliable sources for Koreans in Italy!! 98.154.125.78 (talk) 13:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You people are odd! Not one of you can find a reliable source on Koreans in Italy- I discovered an old article was deleted at the end of August 2009 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.27.108.59 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh yes, it was deleted because there were no reliable, non-trivial sources about the topic. cab (talk) 04:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

non-trivial?? So YOU WANT trivial info for an article??