Template:Did you know nominations/Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of South Korea
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Not a 5x expansion
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Korean ethnic nationalism, Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of South Korea, Racism in South Korea
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
The South Korean flag. Until July 2007, the South Korean pledge of allegiance was to the "Korean race".
- ... that until July 2007, the South Korean pledge of allegiance was to the "Korean race" and not to the country of South Korea?
Expanded by Illegitimate Barrister (talk). Self-nominated at 23:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC).
- @Illegitimate Barrister: Which article of the three is your main DYK article? None of them are wikilinked in your proposed hook. And my brief checking says that none f them are new or expanded 5 times. One of them is actually at AFD. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Like Dharmadhyaksha mentions, none of these articles have been expanded fivefold:
- Korean ethnic nationalism - less than 1k chars have been added to this 12k+ char article since the start of March. Only four edits since the start of April; two of which were made by a bot, the other two were a rollback and revert. Also, it already appeared on DYK back in 2010.
- Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of South Korea - has less than 1k chars and is still a stub.
- Racism in South Korea - is heading for a snow keep at AFD, but again less than 1k chars have been added to this 13k+ char article since the start of March. Barely anything, other than an edit war, occurred over the past two months.
- This nomination isn't eligible for DYK because there is no valid (new) content to review. Fuebaey (talk) 06:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)