Talk:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5

Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

IGN Convention (3 participants)
Vector Unit (3 participants)
Anton Rayne (9 participants)
Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) (4 participants)
Darkworks (4 participants; relisted)
Ayeah Games (3 participants; relisted)
Keemokazi (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Why are Ride and Shred considered "spin-offs"?

These are "main" games in the series. They were developed by Robomodo (the primary developers of the series after Neversoft) and released for all three major seventh generation home consoles (PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, and Wii). I can't find any evidence that they are "spin-offs" of the series, and I don't remember them ever being described as such. Jericho735 Jericho735 (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto1":

From Tony Hawk's (series): EW Staff (December 11, 2015). "The 10 Best (And 3 Worst!) Video Games of 2015". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved December 13, 2015.
From Tyler, the Creator: Hyde, Marina (27 August 2015). "Tyler, the Creator, meets his match in Theresa, the Home Secretary, head of the UK branch of Banaholics Anonymous". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 August 2015.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Failure Source

The wiki says that this game was a "commercial failure" but I can't find any sources that says it was.Poke990 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 19:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"the first traditional entry " what does that mean in this context?
- Done it means it is the first main entry, e.g. not a spin-off. changed it to main entry--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"8GB patch" I would link this, indeed I would link both elements of it, the size and the "patch".
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"a great deal" -> "considerably"
Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
" cause no points to be awarded"" -> "attain no points"
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"previous entries" do you mean "previous games in the series"?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What is "branching"?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"10 levels, albeit only seven"' ten/seven or 10/7. I'd go former.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link power-up.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Characters in bold are new to the series" fails ACCESS as some people will find it hard to see that, use a symbol instead/as well as.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Letícia has a diacritic missing.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notes referenced?
- the informations are referenced in the text above, but if you want to I can make references.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Pro Skater 4 ." spare space.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"""Robomodo had consulted with some former Neversoft " both overlinked.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"accessible. Essentially, " I would put a colon here rather than a full stop.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"was panned heavily by critics upon release" overlinked.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
" being panned by critics upon release" followed by "was panned heavily by critics upon release" repetitive, plus the first of the two is unreferenced.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You don't mention release dates/platforms in the prose, is that normal? You don't link Xbox One or PS4 in the reception section...
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
" of NPCs were" explain this before using an abbreviation.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"newly adjusted" hyphenated.
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GameSpot is overlinked but first time it's not in italics, second time it is in italics...
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"framerate" or "frame rate"?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"objective was completed." ref?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"obvious at every turn"." ref?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 44 title has a spare n, no?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 19 v ref 25 Gamespot formatting...
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 22 publisher/website?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Same for refs 36 to 39.
- Done I'm not sure whether they are reliable or not, I didn't put them in the article. However, both could easily be replaced--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Some websites/publishers not referenced, why?
- Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Video games developed in Romania" not mentioned in the article.
- Not done Fun Labs is a Romanian developer, they are in the infobox.
  - In that case, Fun Labs should really be mentioned in the prose, along with their Romanian roots, as that's not at all obvious to the readers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]