Talk:The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Set the importance as low, since it is only obscurely connected with Judaism. Rich Farmbrough, 01:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Removed an absurdity

The suggestion that Joly borrowed from the 'real' protocols is based on a mention of this by Norman Cohn, who however dismissed it as absurd. This makes it invalid, unsourced, so I removed it.

(By analogy, if a book said "those who suggest Joe Soap murdered his wife talk obvious nonsense", you could not use it as a source for a suggestion that Joe Soap actually did murder his wife.)

--GwydionM (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu

WikiProject class rating

Removed an absurdity

Navigation menu

Search