Talk:Strange star
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
no source and really bad grammar
"While this is of course still theoretical; there is good evidence the researchers from this paper provide that point to the collapse.."
What paper? Is the two on a separate line? Why are the sources not placed where it belongs, and how did something with such bad grammar survive a day on Wikipedia. Someone needs to make this not read like gobbledegook.
Categories:
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- C-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Mid-importance