Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 1905

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Yeech

The author seems to be unaware that the gun was sold in both 38 and 32 caliber, among many other problems... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.92.42.220 (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The .32 was a different model. The Model 1905 is specifically the .38 Special.24.182.239.226 (talk) 16:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Smith & Wesson Model 1905

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Smith & Wesson Model 1905's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "PRC":

  • From United States: "Executive Summary: A Population Perspective of the United States". Population Resource Center. May 2000. Archived from the original on June 4, 2007. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  • From Pakistan: Miller, Tracy, ed. (7 October 2009). "Mapping the Global Muslim Population: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Muslim Population". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 27 March 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2010.

Reference named "Jones":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Smith & Wesson Model 1905

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Smith & Wesson Model 1905's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]