Talk:Shearson
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title of the article
Although there is an article about Lehman Brothers and an article about American Express, this article is intended to explore the history of the Shearson side of the firm - tracing its predecessors and the period during which Shearson was merged with American Express, Lehman and EF Hutton. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 11:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move seems to have already been done, nowt for me to do here. Fences&Windows 18:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Shearson Lehman Hutton → Shearson
- Intend to combine Shearson Lehman Hutton with Shearson, Hammill & Co. to create a single article about Shearson from 1902 through the abandonment of the Shearson brand |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 16:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Or Shearson (disambiguation) to Shearson? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I am not sure that makes any sense. They are all variations of the same company over its life. I am going to propose leaving Shearson Hammill & Co. as a separate article at its current location but there is no reason that the main focus of the article should not be on the entire history. This article as currently rewritten should be moved to Shearson. I don't think there needs to be a disambiguation page any more |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 11:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.