Talk:Shaklee/Archives/2015
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Consumerlabs.com report
I removed the ConsumerLab.com report section titled "reception". First, the section title was misleading, but more importantly, it was a routine study on dozens of supplements with no indication of greater significance to the company. If there were reliable WP:SECONDARY sources, it might make sense to reference this, but unless there is some specific, sourced reason to believe the company's products are fraudulently labeled, this information served only to promote the company (and the commercial lab that did the testing). This section was too promotional, and was WP:UNDUE as well. Grayfell (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Shaklee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150330020509/http://shaklee.rotary-potentiometers.com:80/ to http://shaklee.rotary-potentiometers.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)